Not only that but also longer reload times as shots in carousel gets spent more and more, if he really wants that “loader fatigue”.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Well thats just even more cope
You just have bias about Russian weaponary. But the truth is that Russian weapons are on par or can exceed western weapons
Buddy we tslked about china, how do you get to russia cope more.
Those are different countries
Look at which message you’re responding to…
Oh wait no sry
Jesus
Well you can go into hit analysis and just see how massive of a weakspots Chinese tanks have. The only thing Chinese tanks still excels at is speed. Nothing else
Arietes still are way worse. Vt 4 got tbeir spall liners and era buff as well now.
Besides that the guy was right there is no proof of a functional kh38mt.
Its only mock up of the seeker shown once
I really dont think you can actually pull up any example past 1990 where that is true
1 Like
Title: Why is Germany getting nerfed when the stats say otherwise?
I honestly don’t understand Gaijin’s logic anymore. According to the official statistics, Germany’s win rate is only around 45%, clearly below average. Yet the IRIS-T gets nerfed. Meanwhile, nations like Russia have LIMUR and Kh-38 with over 60% win rate, and nothing gets adjusted there.
People on the forum keep complaining about “OP Russian weapons,” but instead of balancing that, Gaijin keeps weakening Germany. Where’s the logic in that? If you look purely at the numbers, it should actually be the other way around to restore balance.
Can anyone explain why Gaijin is doing this?
Guys… Massively of topic here, it’s better if you continue in PM or go to the threads of the other vehicles/nations to discuss those things.
1 Like
Probably anti radiation missiles. Kh31p and its modernized variants are leagues ahead of whatever the west has currently (all I can think of is alarm/harm)
Truth
Fat doubt otherwise russia wouldnt be so completely terrible at SEAD/DEAD and its not like the HARM didnt get modernized multiple times
You are more than welcome to give examples against it but so far youve never done that no matter how much you shrieked BIAS
Ya, I don’t get why this PLA_J16 guy started rage baiting people. Some really should be barred from posting here.
Okay here, I inquired if this report got “fixed” as I suspected it was the reason for the change for the seeker turning on at 4km instead of 10km.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/XT3HT35czuVe
Few minutes later the report got labeled fixed:
So allegedly this change was to prevent the SLM from switching target during mid-flight.
Let’s get pitch forks going for Devil06 /s
4 Likes
I would rather not D:
I will have to check it tho. Not sure how changing seeker activation range would fix DL changing targets, but maybe it did.
1 Like
Presumably the fov of the IRIS-T at 4km would be too small frontally for anything to distract it, like a munition.
But the thing is, it was changing targets before the seeker activated.
Bug report I made was separate to the one changing in the terminal phase.
That one was made by someone else.