this wouldnt pass as a source woult it ?
https://bin.yhdistysavain.fi/1601152/L9PyPMQ7AT9jfDiArSjt0UJan6/Ilmatorjunta%202_17.pdf
(page 35)
its from the finnish army
(so that we have a tiny bit more than just sweedish sources)
Dontkev-psn you think its worth putting in?
added…
Finally sync the DC list and the list here again…
also added some reports
This is the sole reason why bug report manager name should be public
harrassment is bad and not recommened, but then they do shit like this
shame tbh
Anonymity makes it easier for tech mods to not take accountability for their behavior or what they say, a healthy community shouldn’t have to hide people behind it.
They denied it…
They must be told to reject anything that claims speeds faster than Mach 2. He said there are enough secondary sources but this time it isn’t enough info because the secondary sources “aren’t from the country of origin”.
To be fair, only 2 (but I’d would say 1) of the sources looked to be credible, the rest are third party style works.
And since when is THAT a requirement? We’ve been using “non-country of origin” sources for years and that’s never been an issue. Heck, I used them to report German vehicles before and they were happily accepted, but NOW that something that may bring about the end of Russia’s fun at top tier is getting added, NOW they want to be super specific?
Yea, they’re trippling down. They made up ALL OF SLM’S stats, and they wanna keep it this way. Remember that in absence of sources, Gaijin will turn to their own calculations and math, right? But they r reject that when it comes from the playerbase.
at this point it just feels like brainrot
why is nobody making a bug report if the missile is totaly wrong or is ther a bug report somewhere
I dont think gajin would take any hints from a Forum especialy if it helps to improfe the game
Literally the first post here…
is gaijin even taking notes abt this thread or are they just ignoring this?
doenst matter, aslong as the reports get passed its fine
but does this realy gets passed on?
all those are passed
so they are ingnoring facts. nice job Gayjin
???
Yes, its an sentence
I swear if that’s the same person denying all the reports, they need to seriously rethink their influence.
What’s the absolute worst is the closing of the report instantly without giving anyone a chance to comment on this bs.
I mean they are constantly moving the goal post and yet again we already provided primary sources for range and time to target, so these secondary sources SHOULD be eligible to be used to get the speed value to ADD to the primary reports…
How is it not supplementing the primary reports? They all support the manufacturers claim and paint a more accurate picture. Why are they purposefully ignoring info and randomly selecting numbers that make no sense?!
@Gunjob Sorry for pinging you, I just have the feeling we might need someone with fresh eyes over here. There is a lot of seemingly unjust action going around and maybe you could shed some more led on the situation.
I have never heard of secondary sources to be required to be from the country of origin. Has that ever been the rule?
Dev Server got .33, nothing changed for the SLM in it
but this was added with is likely to be used one day on the SLM
All reports that got rejected cuz of some unwritten rule, latest being secondary source is not from the country of origin??? Sweden is known for testing weapon systems in-depth and providing more than decent documentation from their testing.
I think for it to count fully those sources also needs to be in the report. So you can’t really send “new” sources on their own hoping that they get added to the old ones, you have to provide all the sources in one cohesive report with explanations of what the sources are, what they say and what category they are. You can’t just post a list of links with no further information and hope that everything is understood, especially when it’s in other languages.
That answer is still a bit odd though, i can’t personally remember there being a requirement of country of origin in that way before. I do know there are requirements when it comes to RU sources on Western equipment as well as the other way around, but EU-EU sources i haven’t seen being a thing before.
