First source here is likely no good, it's third party that links to other sources
I just found this but i don’t know how trustworthy the source is, and it might actually be a third party source perhaps but i’m unsure (though it is written by a Swedish military analyst):
They don’t have any. I’ve scoured the web for any source that mentions M 2.0 of the SL(M) and that simply DOESN’T EXIST. Be it primary, secondary, or some forum, a speed of M 2.0 is never mentioned anywhere.
Their stats for the SLM are completely made up.
Actual max range according to the Bundeswehr btw is 50km’s, making the effective range of 40km pretty cut 'n clear, well we don’t even get effective range of 15km’s in WT, lol.
Perhaps, the first one is a bit… questionable? perhaps.
The second is a magazine that gets released once every two months by the “Swedish Federation for Voluntary Defence Education and Training (Försvarsutbildarna)”. so likely a bit better.
Yeah, i’ve gotten really good at using google to the full potential. It’s amazing what you can find once you know how to tag the search properly.
I am trying to find some info in German as that’s my native language anyway, but most info is from random magazines or repeated from the sources we already gave to Gaijin. I am not giving up yet, though :D
The report was not initally handled by a Technical Moderator.
From what I can see the report (or rather the information within) has already since been linked up with an existing forwarded report by a Technical Moderator:
the link provided mentions air launched iris-t ,not ground launched one thats the issue. a vertically launched missile from ground level would bleed more speed than an air launched missile (at high alt). i think the slm should easily be able to reach mach 3 irl due to it being a bigger missile but ig gaijin cant find a primary source so they are maybe intentionally nerfing it.
