Iris-t slm

Machinery of War Discussion Ground Vehicle
379

I have some questions about the radar:

  1. Looking at other radars, is there a reason only the russian/chinese top-tier AA have that markers in third-person for all currently detected Targets instead of just the actively tracked one ?

Seems like a nice feature to have especially when it comes keeping track of ammunitions.

  1. Is it possible to mannualy select the target i want to shot at instead of having to switch trough all contacts ?
    (im talking abut the new radarscreen)
380

Website is bad in mobile, so I’m trying to find the report itself, idk if I can access it though cause I don’t live in a NATO country

No offence, but we shouldn’t apply this logic. Otherwise even brochures would be no go, if that is the case.

381

about 2, actually yes, you can select the target via clicking on the target list )))

8 Likes
382

ouhh nice, thank you very much. clunky but atleast it seems to work

383

plane spawns got placed waaaaay further back now so maaaaayybeee gaijin will increase slm performance cuz otherwise i dont rly see the point in doing so

384

Thats so hawt 😍 I get to play button pressing airspace defender <3

1 Like
385

according to BVVD it is planned that you can click on any screen and it would switch to it, (thats why I was trying it :) ) but currently (ONLY) the target list works for that

Planned finnish menu:

image
image1220×563 107 KB

2 Likes
386

well lets see…, “planned” can mean anything with Gaijin

387

This was a no-brainer, and actually quite a good change overall, so tired of being shot down by fox 3 as soon as you spawn, this will hopefully help. Why wasn’t this done long ago…

388

I agree with that, but it wasn’t a primary source or a brochure, it was a secondary source with dubious wording and Gaijin immediately settled on that to nerf it.

1 Like
389

And you need at least 2 sources if secondary btw, another report (on SLM speed) got denied because only 1 of the sources was valid and secondary.
Wonder why this one got trough?

1 Like
390

3 scenarios:

  1. The devs was lazy and want SLM nerf
  2. The guy has some relationship with internal devs so it passed
  3. The devs team told bug report manager to accept all SLM stuff and they fix cuz they fixing it atm(apparently not)
  4. The guy was banned for leaking classified documents, they arent taking chances so they accepted what he give, later bug report would change it
1 Like
391

Too long time to target report closed with ‘Not enough info’ tag. Community Bug Reporting System
image
What do they even want from us. There was no further elaboration than the closing of the issue.

4 Likes
392

u should dms tech mod about this

393

We did that allready, they arent happy about the sources, but we might found an source which they like, (still waiting for answer)

394

So they said nothing, not a “we believe blahblahblah”, just closed it, idk honestly, i’m not expecting anything good from the internal report they have either on range.

2 Likes
395

bummers

396

grafik
grafik1114×120 19.4 KB

397

tbf, he also used outdated in game data…

398

Maybe we shouldn’t have added the Kh-38 in the first place, modern GBADs are almost all shrouded by classified info, this is just dumb, why promise modern AA if they are all gonna be gimped and DOA in game.

Maybe we should’ve just received MAN Pantsir and avoid all these headaches by trying to fight the reporting system.

1 Like