good luck :)
we also since the speed of the ingame SLM was known, maybe we have now something usefull (still wait on answer for it), but aslong as the report for the Incorrect range is accepted the is still there…
what exactly does it mean with the report of the incorrect range being in the internal reports of them?
that a good thing?
Probably means it got lumped or referenced on the internal report tech mods have (afaik, that’s also part of their job)
its an Report which is made from an gaijin employe(Mod/QA/GM/Dev), like the reports we can make just not on the CBR site but in there internal system
means theres still hope?
also has anyone tried contacting Nomma or diehl?
hope? Yes
diehl/nomma? yes, but they wont talk about the SLM
Mb i ment Nammo.
well, diehl is also correct since they are the developer of it
On the solid missile product page they state and i quote “To do so, these rocket motors must be able to release sufficient energy to accelerate a 150 kg missile to Mach 3.5 or more within seconds of being launched.”
It was a malicious report from a bad actor, that guy is banned from the forums for posting classified information. He has a hate boner for Germany, but thanks to his stupidity we got massive buffs for the Brimstone release window :)
Hoping the devs revert the nerf, IRIS-T is obviously capable of more than 50G.
1 Like
you mean the window improvement for the release(Brimstone)? thats allready live
I was talking about the “nerf” to the IRIS-T 😁
They only say “reported 50G turns” whatever test they conducted was only capable of achieving that, but it doesn’t mean maximum overload, it could be more or greater in a different environment or test conditions.
1 Like
Reported 50gs turns could mean anything
Nerfing base din that is beyond stupid
1 Like
To their credit, they did provide a source for it.
do we need to call Gunjob for this
currently updated the list with reports…
WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH YOU???
Why arent you as your brothers???
3 Likes
no need, we are on it allready…
1 Like
The source doesn’t say anything other than “50G reported”, no test details, no hard data, nothing. It could’ve been a single test conducted under certain parameters that we don’t know. It’s so ambiguous it can hardly be called a source.
You forgot to add smth :p