Maybe thats why lol.
Anyway, here is another report, I don’t if you missed it; Community Bug Reporting System
uhhh, thats an Nice report )))))
sadly no label :(
I have some questions about the radar:
- Looking at other radars, is there a reason only the russian/chinese top-tier AA have that markers in third-person for all currently detected Targets instead of just the actively tracked one ?
Seems like a nice feature to have especially when it comes keeping track of ammunitions.
- Is it possible to mannualy select the target i want to shot at instead of having to switch trough all contacts ?
(im talking abut the new radarscreen)
Website is bad in mobile, so I’m trying to find the report itself, idk if I can access it though cause I don’t live in a NATO country
No offence, but we shouldn’t apply this logic. Otherwise even brochures would be no go, if that is the case.
about 2, actually yes, you can select the target via clicking on the target list )))
8 Likes
ouhh nice, thank you very much. clunky but atleast it seems to work
plane spawns got placed waaaaay further back now so maaaaayybeee gaijin will increase slm performance cuz otherwise i dont rly see the point in doing so
Thats so hawt 😍 I get to play button pressing airspace defender <3
1 Like
according to BVVD it is planned that you can click on any screen and it would switch to it, (thats why I was trying it :) ) but currently (ONLY) the target list works for that
Planned finnish menu:
2 Likes
well lets see…, “planned” can mean anything with Gaijin
This was a no-brainer, and actually quite a good change overall, so tired of being shot down by fox 3 as soon as you spawn, this will hopefully help. Why wasn’t this done long ago…
I agree with that, but it wasn’t a primary source or a brochure, it was a secondary source with dubious wording and Gaijin immediately settled on that to nerf it.
1 Like
And you need at least 2 sources if secondary btw, another report (on SLM speed) got denied because only 1 of the sources was valid and secondary.
Wonder why this one got trough?
1 Like
3 scenarios:
- The devs was lazy and want SLM nerf
- The guy has some relationship with internal devs so it passed
The devs team told bug report manager to accept all SLM stuff and they fix cuz they fixing it atm(apparently not)- The guy was banned for leaking classified documents, they arent taking chances so they accepted what he give, later bug report would change it
1 Like
Too long time to target report closed with ‘Not enough info’ tag. Community Bug Reporting System
What do they even want from us. There was no further elaboration than the closing of the issue.
4 Likes
u should dms tech mod about this
We did that allready, they arent happy about the sources, but we might found an source which they like, (still waiting for answer)
So they said nothing, not a “we believe blahblahblah”, just closed it, idk honestly, i’m not expecting anything good from the internal report they have either on range.
2 Likes
bummers
