with and without aerodynamic nose cone?
Nah, just SLS and SLM, have yet to find a SLM without the balistic cone.
But the picture shows very well where the cone starts.
Devblog:
> 2 vehicles
> “IRIS-T SL”
bruh.png
and i swear to god if i see one person unironically telling me that its called “IRIS-T SL”, i’m deleting this post
Diehl in the corner:
send them an email.
I already have an unanswered e-mail open with them, you do it xD
i did
and guess what they said
That it’s called SLM and they can’t be arsed to update their websites?
approx that yes
Airspace is closed.
does the SLM lack a description or something?
Tested it in test drive - the new MV feature is absolutely great !
The IRIS-T SLM is quite insane in therms of capability, I love it.
But it also has its weaknesses; its very damn big and easy to spot, probly can’t intercept anything within 2km (even though there is seems to be thrust control now from the looks of it ?) and yea - But its insane for long range and multi target intercept.
If someone has the SLM i’d be happy to hop in a custom and test max engagement limits and anti-munition capabilities, DM.
It can kill targets at even 1km(the SLM), they pull insanely hard.
@DirectSupport your french colleaugue is maliciously misinterpreting sources again
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/42TKQybSK2b2
50G reported turns does not equal max G turns
I wasn’t privy to the report, yes that’s true that 50G reported turns = / = max 50G, but if developers already have a reliable source stating 60G then there shouldn’t be anything to worry about. I think they would only use 50G if the source they had stating 60G was not a reliable/shoddy source. Would you happen to have anything stating 60G? Otherwise Gaijin does have a habit of relying on available sources depending on the reliability of the sources.
For instance, MICA missile’s primary source doesn’t say “Max 50G”, it just says 50G but that is what Gaijin used.
yep, just wanted to inform you that he still is continuing to do that