and so whats the commanality again? literally every country in the world has some ties with each other, I dont think huey (not even italian by the way, just licensed production) and artillery systems are justifications
2 Likes
This looks like a horrible proposal and like it was written by AI. Not a good look. Romania would be a better sub.
12 Likes
for sure, close geographically and in military history
1 Like
Iranian equipment should go to which country’s equipment it was based on/copied, so China, Russia and USA. They have very little unique vehicles for them to deserve a sub tree
1 Like
This is confunsing, while most used or formely used Iranian equipment dates from Soviet equipments, why it won’t should be a Soviet sub-tech tree, despite, Iran has a lot of things to offer, but I’m in favor of Slovakia as a possible sub-tech tree to the USSR tech tree. Italy is likely to recieve a lot of few eastern european countries, which is mostly, to actual historical ties to them or simply due to joint military development.
did you write this in chatGPT?
1 Like
Romania already is an italian subTT
It’s not, Italy is a home for minor axis nations but that doesn’t make Romania a subtree, just that Romanian vehicles added will likely go to Italy.
+1 (I’m an italy main feed me more subtrees)
Both Hungary and Romania are considered italian subtrees
Being housed in does not mean it is a subtree. A subtree means any vehicles of that nation which are added will go to the home nation. Being housed means any vehicles of that nation which are added will likely go to the home nation unless there is reason for exception.
All the romanian vehicles are going to be added there, it’s not likely, it’s confirmed.
The only one that isn’t being brought over is the premium helicopter and we already asked why this is the case.
And this is the same case of the Indian vehicles inside the UK TT, small additions.
But if you want to still believe otherwise, feel free to.
Absolutely not
1 Like
This is not how host nations work. India is a subtree of Britain as well so weird comparison.
I believe Iran could play a role in the game but i would rather see it as a combination of Middle east nations put together and named “MEC” (Middle East Coalition) or have Iran as a sub tree for Russia. I dont see why it should be a sub tree in Italy since this reason you mention is too vague. A true Spanish sub tree with the current hungary vehicles as a sub tree for Italy would be better and make more sense, if you want to fill in some gaps (Even if to some extent Spain perhaps could stand by its own). Maybe even put Turkey in as a sub tree for Italy, that would probably make more sense than Iran (Personaly i would have Turkey as a standalone nation tho).
I would have tried to argue for a “MEC” nation instead with Iran as its baseline.
Your word againts Smin’s.
Keep thinking what you want.
I don’t think theres a difference between a subtree and “being housed within” a nation, for something to be a subtree it doesn’t have to necessarily be a continuous line of vehicles, it can be just a few vehicles dotted around a nations tech tree
(also there is a romanian helicopter in the french tree, but that was added before subtrees were even a thought inside gaijins head)
Please pull out the quotes which disprove what I have said. There are none.
Haha, no
→ there’s bound to be historical connection between all countries if you look hard enough
→ you highlighted their cooperation and ties weren’t military so it doesn’t make too much sense imo
→ their equipment has nothing in common, it would just be adding a bunch of russian tech into the italian tree and I’m not the biggest fan of that idea