This should be increased to at least 50 games, probably even a 100.
With 10 games you don’t have even 20% of the mods unlocked.
16 Likes
They are:
1 Like
My skim reading has failed me… I feel like this should in large bold font near the top of the article though. Please community managers, scream this from the roof tops!
2 Likes
Depends entirely on the rank of the vehicle, you can spade rank 1 and 2 vehicles in a couple of games, rank 3-5 in less than 30. A scaling amount of battles in the vehicle that increases per rank might be a better idea.
6 Likes
Fair enough. Make it scale with rank I guess.
2 Likes
Ctrl and + should fix that for u
Or just have the requirement of a spaded vehicle to be able to rate it perhaps?
10 Likes
AFAIK no, it’s available only via Gaijin store.
Are you logged in?
Hey… I don’t know what was your intention with the new and flashy wiki, only containing “stats”, (so, literally not a wiki AT ALL.) But I respectfully suggest you put back all (yes, ALL.) the extensive Usage in battle, gameplay suggestions, and historical text, all the missing sections per plane into it very fast.
Especially for BF 109 G-6 and all the others you basically stripped from all explanations and text.
OR at least give us a link to an archived version of the previous wiki.
There was years of information stored with all planes there. PLEASE let us access that text AGAIN.
16 Likes
I like that I am now being able to quickly switch between nations when in Ground Vehicles for example.
The available camos takes way too much space on mobile. It should be somewhere at the bottom or on the side as it is not crucial info.
Oh wonderful, much appreciated 🍻
2 Likes
That would also work, but for especially top teir vehicles you can play many games in the vehicle after unlocking all of the performance modifications, and still not have the vehicle spaded as you have not got all of the random a2g loadouts or vice versa. Ultimately the ratings are not really the be all end all of how good or bad a vehicle is, so I do not think restricting people from rating things very much is a good idea. Let people say what they will, and the prevailing trends will be apparent.
2 Likes
I know about zooming in, however that also increases the size of the text. Which is not what i am asking for.
For example, as a comparison, Wikipedia also changed their layout, and i don’t like that because the same reasons, therefore i have changed it back into what it was once before, with a script that changes the design into the old vector design.
The possibility to change it into a design that makes use of the whole screen is what i am asking for.
3 Likes
im having the issue as well
4 Likes
Oh, another thing that will be sorely missed: Limits now are less detailed, so instead of for example speed limits for Combat, Take-off and Landing Flaps you only get an entry for “Flaps” - which is of zero use.
Knowing the safe operating limits of flaps and gear is fundamentally important when learning to fly a new type!!!
18 Likes
Ok I am missing one crucial information, that I used the wiki most frequently for - ammo rack positions and capacity for ground vehicles.
8 Likes
Yes.
Please Gaijin IMPROVE. NOT just change thing. This is yet one more example of changing something without improving it. It was better before!
If you cant make it better then dont mess with it.
First the stat card and now this. Whats going on? Are you trying to convert everything WT into a mobile game?
9 Likes