I have nothing more to discuss with you. After all, the primary issue here is between China and Japan; the Thai-Japan alliance matter is secondary. No matter how much you argue, you cannot change the fundamental fact that Thai vehicles in the game fight under Japan’s identity.
In fact, the bulky hulls and haphazardly placed ammunition make these tanks highly vulnerable in intense urban combat.
1 Like
Oh I see, but what about the great and glorious ariete C1 which also has badly placed ammunition.
Also if we are talking about ammunition, the ZTZ99 comparatively has better placement
Ditto… It’s almost like that’s how export vehicles work in this game.
The exported tank goes to the nation that it was exported to…
1 Like
However, the Challenger 2 (CR2) has another issue—its penetration capability. The penetration of its L27A1 ammunition is somewhat lower than that of the DTC series rounds used by ZTZ-series tanks.
primary issue is between China, Japan, AND THAILAND. No matter what main tech tree, flag, identity you want to argue, the primary conversation INCLUDES Thailand as this is a clear sabotage to the Thai-sub tech tree
2 Likes
Yes yes, you are correct. But what about the Leclerc which also has lower penetration capability? I thought this was a great vehicle?
I think the Italian main battle tank I see the most is the Hungarian Leopard 2A7. In fact, the weak protection of the Ariete is also due to incorrect model making.
1 Like
Does the 2A7 make Italy stronger than China in-game? I must know
Even though this is an export vehicle, do you really think Chinese players would accept their own domestically manufactured equipment being placed under the tech tree of a hostile nation that committed atrocities on their soil and has since refused to reflect or show remorse?
And you country decided to export those vehicle to Thailand also the fact. Just like the example you mention the L2, Germany government decided to export + aid L2 to other countries that mean they already prepared to faced their own-manufacture tank that in enemy hand on the battlefield at the future. Same with the VT-4, but just the first confrontation is in this game. At the end it is THAI’s VT-4 if Thailand is only secondary then I don’t think China shouldn’t matters anywhere in this issue.
10 Likes
As far as I know, the French even submitted the tank’s manual to prove that the Leclerc has serious protection deficiencies in the game. However, so far, apart from securing a faster reload speed, they have gained nothing in other aspects.
1 Like
Don’t argue with them, agree with them and let their own logic be their demise. Its funnier that way
But your friend said they were great tanks, better than ztz99
Leclerc’s penetration capability, while only slightly lower than that of the ammunition used by the Chinese ZTZ series, is compensated for by its five-second reload rate, which mitigates the drawback of its shell’s lower penetration to some extent. As long as the first shot doesn’t disable its autoloader, it retains the opportunity to retaliate.
I’m gonna be honest, I don’t care.
For years the standard for this game has been that each nation gets claim to all of their vehicles – including export vehicles.
If Chinese players suddenly want to take issue with that, they’re more than free to do that. But feel free to talk to US, Russia, Germany, Sweden, etc. players who constantly have their vehicles exported to nations they are not friendly with nowadays.
1 Like
you make no sense
Since you claim not to care about these matters, then the completeness of the Thai subtree truly has nothing to do with you. Otherwise, your statements would be entirely self-contradictory.
2 Likes
I do care about Thailand getting vehicles they rightfully bought.
I don’t care that Chinese players would get upset about this.
1 Like
💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀
type it out at least, be a man
3 Likes