This is just my immature idea
If anyone have a better one, I’m glad too see it
Gaijin’s double standards.
1 Like
where is that double standarts?
if they had those missiles they would be atleast 12.7/ 13.0 incase of the Jh-7
they would do worse after getting them
also the J-8F has the Pl-5E2 already which is better than the Pl-8B imo
No Singapore to China, inconceivable, never.
Do you really want to add yet another Western aligned country to China? Which would give them Hunters, more F-5s, F-16C/D Block 52+, and even F-15SG and F-35A and F-35B, terrible idea when China has domestic equivalents of all these like the J-15, J-16, J-10C, J-20 and J-35, and even including direct options through Taiwan like the F-16V Block 70, Gaijin still hasn’t given us the F-CK-1 to this day and it should’ve come a long time ago alongside the F/A-18s since it’s similar, it would be basically another one of China’s own unique jet, but nooo, let’s give them Singapore which would be better off in Japan too or Israel, more copy paste band aids to a nation that doesn’t need it.
Also China itself has so many domestic vehicles to be added for both air and ground it’s funny how they haven’t been added yet, I started playing with China in this game because I believed that someday all those cool and unique Chinese vehicles would come and I’d be able to play with them, I bought premium vehicles for this reason and gave you my money, China has so much potential and it can literally be a major nation because that’s what it is in real life specially in modern times, so please do not deviate from the core issues and fix the vehicles the Chinese community wants and needs fixed, and do not anger the rest of the world with a poor decision to add Singapore to China, the Chinese players don’t want it, the Singaporeans don’t want it, many other Asians as well as Europeans and Americans don’t want that. Do not alienate your entire community with some irreversible decision like that, you can change course, no Singapore to China. You’re better off fleshing out the nations they already have as subtrees like Pakistan and Bangladesh, throw in Myanmar or Cambodia if you wish too but not without prioritizing China’s own designs.
3 Likes
The roadmap after the May 26th protest movement? Come on, just look at how many of their promises from back then have actually been fulfilled. They hardly even mention that roadmap anymore. 😡
2 Likes
The Su-25T at BR 11.3 can carry R-73s, and the Jaguar IS at BR 11.3 can carry Magic 2 missiles. But what about the JH-7A at BR 12.3? Does Gaijin genuinely believe that the all-aspect PL-5C is on par with those missiles?
2 Likes
the Su-25 is sub sonic aircraft
and the Jaguar is a flying brick
a double standart would be, if there was a Jh-7 in another thech tree at the same br as the chinese one with better missiles
as I said, they cant satisfied everyone, but they can make everyone not-satisfied
7 Likes
Is the JH-7A’s dogfighting performance really that outstanding? What kind of airframe performance justifies it fighting at 12.3 with only four missiles lacking countermeasure resistance? Does the JH-7A possess the exceptional agility of an F-16, or the extreme speed of a MiG-21bis? None of this adds up
1 Like
The roadmap is useless if they didn’t want to follow it
You make a valid point with this, and I agree and try to do the same.
It’s an online video game, I feel like players should leave their personal political and religious views at the door. This should include nationalism and any other real world prejudice/bias they might have as well. It serves no purpose in the context of the game.
And it is quite common for players from any country/area/region to show great dismay that “their country” is not treated fairly, the military vehicles in game are not up to their standards/expectations and other countries are getting preferential treatment.
I suppose it is mostly “human nature” and whether justified or not, in the end it comes down to being able to play the game we are given and not stressing over the “small stuff”(it’s ALL small stuff).
Personally, I do not care when you were born, where you were born or who your parents are . . . non-issues.
It doesn’t matter where you sit when you play, what kind of platform you use to play the game or any of that kind of stuff.
If you can bring something to the table, be a decent team mate/opponent and have some game . . . bring it and let’s play! (just don’t be an ahole).
I’m sorry some folks feel “mistreated”, and I also do not think Gaijin has intentionally done anything to any particular group on purpose. It simply is not good “business” and Gaijin is a business, the goal is to provide a product for us to play while turning a profit . . same as any other business out there.
For these reasons it is pretty easy to see why Gaijin will never be able to please everybody . . . just too much diversity. What we(players) can do is take things with a grain of salt and learn to enjoy the game and each other’s differences as they are.
I think it is best not to take/make things “personal” and especially on the internet.
Rarely does anything good come of that . . . .
I see, thanks. Looks like I was wrong—most of the things mentioned in that image have actually been implemented in the updates over the past couple of years.
2 Likes
look at the mig-29 if you are already crying about the Jh-7
Stealing this
You can’t compare CAP with CAS.
1 Like
Does the JH-7A truly deserve its 12.3 Battle Rating with only these non-countermeasure resistant missiles? Given its poor top speed, can it even reliably reach and destroy base targets? And if it cannot, what is the realistic probability of securing kills with only PL-5C and PL-8 missiles against top-tier opponents?
1 Like
Im with you 1000%
Ive done my best to fix some of the worst offenders for bad modelling, waiting on the devs to get around to it all. (in fairness they have been good with my more recent reports)
2 Likes
you know the phantoms only have aim 9 G at 12.0 and the hornet has 9L and rather meh sparrows at 12.3 too.
this isnt a china only issue