Where’s the type 85 series or type 98 or type 90 or type 15
for that I quote
No they hide in their basement
3 Likes
Stop discussing this brain-dead VT4 and Singapore’s sub-tech tree with its utterly unremarkable vehicles. This is just Gaijin and BVVD stirring the pot with their bullshit. The announcement should have addressed how to fix the erroneous data Chinese vehicles have suffered from Gaijin’s unfair treatment all along. Every time you bring up this brain-dead VT4 and Singaporean tech tree, Gaijin and BVVD are laughing their asses off—because they’ve clearly turned this pile of shit into a watery mess.
1 Like
Its not even chinese vehicle specific, its the entiriety of bug report site.
Chinese MBTs still lacking spallliners to this day
Not a bug
Clear marketing lie
Forwarded as suggestion (2 years ago)
Showing IRIS-T SL as proof for SLM orienting phase but then saying SL and SLM are different missiles when it comes to IRCCM
List could go on and on.
You’re right — the priority of these two issues indeed doesn’t compare to restoring the proper status of Chinese tanks. But some players are deliberately muddying the waters by fixating on these currently irrelevant problems.
3 Likes
With the amount of frustration at Gaijin in these comments, you’d think more people would be aware of what they need to do in order to get meaninful change. Feedback and comments on here mean very little in the long run.
Not like that other thing did much in the long run let’s be real. Also people who did it are still likely “doing” it since they really haven’t fixed what they said they would.
1 Like
I mean, it’s harmful for a video game to sell national identity. How do you think that’s spiteful? Do you really ‘that’ like acting like a cyber-soldier instead of just being a fan of cool weapons?
Your icon picture isn’t that persuadable
As I’ve said in my now deleted post that some butthurt people reported, there is no sale of “national identity” in this game. Thats a term you made up to try and farm more engagement. Its a video game, there is no politics involved in the sale of premium vehicles or the placement of vehicles in tech trees.
The only people who are bringing up issues over a nothing burger are those that are actively doing so in this thread like right now.
2 Likes
i just think it’s cool and that’s enough.
no sale? no identity? so is it proper to add sinapore to china too, do you really think so?why most people under this post is crying about this?
admit it, gaijin is selling national identity. that’s how their revenue and community culture comes from. but it is causing many problems too.
2 Likes
they want their own version. let them have it. if it not profitable. close it and let them find the way to play global. it GLOBAL server. everyone from every country have right to vote. not only chinese.
one vote for me is ASEAN is the best one put in Japan and they already vote for it for long time now.
You can’t sell national identity. And while people of this forum are debating whether or not it should go there, I don’t particularly care where it goes, as I like to keep my politics separate from the game I play and enjoy.
1 Like
you dont care = the problem never exists
good logic.
Gaijin, as a game company, should steer clear of politically sensitive issues rather than practicing double standards. If it can sidestep political controversies related to Europe and America, why should political issues involving China be treated any differently?
4 Likes
Neither do China have any advance cas for china tree between 10.3-11. 3. And WHAT IS THE SINGAPORE tech tree have any relationship with Japan. And even you said China have access to Pakistani and North Korean vehicles, could you list any of unique vehicles from those two countries in China tech tree? It’s simply the’s inability and unfair treatment over the tech trees. Even if gaijin had add few unique thing into China it would not receive that much accusations. I would be happy even if the basic fairness is shown in the treatment like the North Korean Mig23 or Pakistani F16C/D being add to China tree.
Just because you can make up an issue doesn’t mean it exists. Its a game, there are no politics in a game, and the only people who bring politics into the game are those that want to make an issue out of something that while an issue IRL, does not, and I repeat, DOES NOT belong in the game.
I don’t envy Chinese players, I am tired of hearing them trying to veto vehicles from being added to the game because they believe they can bring their political issues into a video game where their issues should not be brought up. There’s real life places and forums where geopolitics can be discussed and voices of disdain can be made.
And while I acknowledge that the Singaporean players have issues with their nation being put in as a sub-tree to China which honestly doesn’t need one as they have enough domestic vehicles and domestic modifications of foreign vehicles to be added to the game that it’s unnecessary but at the same time Singapore can’t be added as a sub-tree to the UK tree because we’ve already got South Africa in it and India is slated to be added to the tree, sometime in the far future when the game is probably close to EoS and needs to breathe some new life into it.
So the only other option that can happen for Singapore is if there comes a Pan-Asian tech tree which combines all the nations that don’t have enough vehicles on their own into one large tree that covers all the necessary bases. But Gaijin won’t add one. So the only other option is for Singapore to not be added to the game then and their own domestic modified vehicles be split among the different national trees as premiums or event vehicles.
Look, I’ve been reported again. Is stating the facts not allowed?
1 Like