This is like Spain going to Britain as a subtree because it’s the same continent
1 Like
Yeah. It’s just really stupid to put it in the kindest possible terms.
Plus, I do not really understand the basis of your perspective. SK and Japan are not bound by a military alliance (Yeah, just like Singapore and China). Furthermore, Singapore and China are conducting direct combined military exercises themselves in multiple military branches even this year, SK and Japan are doing such ONLY when the US participates too as a bridge.
As I already said, I do not support adding Singapore to China as well. But I must point out that your perspective in these countries is pure double standard.
3 Likes
Just fool the players, don’t fool yourself.
3 Likes
air maybe, but the ground has many unique modified/original vehicles very its own style
I guess one could also say it’s Singapore going to ROC/Taiwan lol
Stir up trouble and provoke player confrontation，this is gaijin！！！
1 Like
In other news, Italy is being added to Hungary!
2 Likes
Gib South Korea to Japan already 😉
This is not the core demand of Chinese players. We have never said that Singaporean vehicles need to be added to the Chinese technology tree. This is entirely Gaijin’s own idea, attempting to spark a war among players
4 Likes
But the reality now is that there is no objective standard for gaijin to add another tech tree, isn’t it?Could Indonesian vehicles be suitable for Japan？If so why do not add polish and more Soviet Denmark vehicles to Germany?Would it be appropriate for Dutch and Belgian vehicles to join the French ones?The correlation between Italy and Hungary is not very high, is it?
Gaijin: we found that Chinese players are disappointed about our differential treatment towards them and Chinese vehicles, so we decided to add vehicles from Singapore to CN tech tree, and we will still treat Chinese players and vehicles arrogantly in the future.
Gaijin can either improve Chinese top tier vehicles’ performance to make it similiar to the top 3 or 4 (like German, USSR, USA and Sweden), or add sub-nations like IT JP FR or UK tech tree. As a country that has plenty of advanced modern ground combat vehicles, helicopters and combat aircrafts as well as their armaments in reality, the Chinese tech tree should receive such treatment.
But Gaijin didn’t do either of these things.
2 Likes
Now the Chinese tech tree is the only one (apart from Israel) that has neither sub-tree or a full 5–line tech tree.
Chinese vehicles has been mistreated by Gaijin for 6+ years 万字讨贼檄文——罄竹难书的战争雷霆 with countless acts of differential treatment and deliberate discrimination. Issues aimed at restoring their historical performance have been rejected easily, while for those malicious ones aimed at nerfing them and making them ineligible Gaijin accepted them easily, even if they provide little authentic information.
After the long-standing dissatisfaction and resentment have been ignited by this spark of Thai VT-4 which was leaked just before the Chinese V-J day, Gaijin and its followers tried to confuse the players and avoid the core issues by stating that Chinese players are mainly nationalists that refuse to give their vehicles to other nations. In response, the measure of adding Singaporean vehicles to Chinese tech tree was proposed, which was perfunctory and did not solve the problem, and triggered arguments and disputes between players from China and other nations.
3 Likes
Chinese players have tried to express their anger and dissatisfaction, and explain the whole controversy to other countries’ players. There have been several videos and threads discussing this on Chinese social media.
Regrettably, for the past entire month Gaijin has been deleting Chinese players’ voices on the WT official platform in order to deceive other players and prevent related discussions.
【中系史话】中系都遭受了啥？玩家为何积怨已久
万字讨贼檄文——罄竹难书的战争雷霆
4 Likes
Stimulating conflicts and arguments among players can make them shift and reduce their focus on Gaijin’s poor game production, and lead to a lack of unity among players, making it difficult to organize against Gaijin’s wrongdoing, such as reducing incomes and increasing research expenses.
3 Likes
This is what is required, distracting people with side issues and not solving anything. The best thing to do than to include the Singapore tree is to add Chinese tanks and planes. China has many distinctive things, but why the trouble?
3 Likes
Imagine being a nationalistic Chinese and seeing the pinnacle vehicles of your beloved Chinese tech tree being Singaporean SAMP/T for anti-air, Singaporean Leopard 2 for tank, and Mirage 2000-5 for air.
F-15SG to keep the Singapore theme
3 Likes
Gaijin is foolish; what they should do is fix China’s ZTZ99A, VT4, CM502, and provide more unique vehicles belonging to China, rather than considering the release of F15SG or Leopard 2SG.
5 Likes
In this case, their nationalistic toxicity would be absolutely helpful since there are trolls that regard adding more copy paste slop as the antidote to their nationalism, when said nationalism would push Gaijin to add more unique Chinese vehicles and less copy paste, which is a net benefit to everyone.