Information Regarding the Thai Subtree and Chinese Vehicles

On the bug reporting platform, many issues related to Chinese vehicles are closed within just a few minutes—even though a single issue would normally take longer than that to review. This suggests that the issue managers are not actually reading through the reports, they are not even being “acknowledged”

1 Like

At least when it comes to Italian navy, you are very subjective, like rejecting information about rate of fire or postpone armor composition changes or keeping different reload rate for the same Minisini cannons on Italian and Soviet vessels.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/eaL6xjKCpZSB
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/IlqqKpYCEgJn

I wouldn’t also call it objective when you fixed Ariete tanks weights, but completely ignored information about protection, so now we have a “WAR” kit intended to defend against KE shells which makes it worse than Kontankt-1, but weights 5.5 t, it’s literally a “heavy air” in the game.

I agree that it helped the tree, bringing some meta stuff, although the implementation was rather dirty, focusing on copypaste vehicles ignoring domestic modifications, plus some decisions made were kinda against the tree, like not giving a heavy tank into the regular tree (Tigris). Hopefully in the future we will get more designs and modifications from Hungary and Romania, as well as Italy of course, there are so many to add, go for it Gaijin!

6 Likes

On the one hand, Gaijin seems to love C&P, but on the other hand, many players also found that the new VT-4 has better protection on its armour and survivability than the old one. Such as the position of the autoloader, which makes players doubt about maybe this tank was for the Japanese tech tree, so they have better survivability, and so Gaijin did not treat the Chinese tech tree equally to the others

4 Likes

Same

So completely ignored at will hten.

I will also add that many Chinese players are upset with Gaijin’s second response regarding the implementation of Chinese vehicles.

It really just reads as “we know what’s realistic, so take this subtree instead”

10/10

1 Like

The whole feelings shit can explode into a communities hating each other by just adding some stuff and it wont get better the longer you do this, just be careful what you add next time where and when. removing stuff from a techtree is also bad solution. its better to be mad at gaijin rather than the communities being hatful to eachother. so they should add the remaining stuff while still looking on the most reasonable concerns, which arent the biggest deal(deleting a whole subtree from a nation.)

1 Like

8 hours ago this was posted and 1,2k replies… we getting traction on this one boys

It’s crazy that when steam is private and cater to gamer so much, gaijin decides to be asshole because they can.

Or because they’re russian.

1 Like

Someone in the Chinese community created an issue and it was NABed within a few minutes.

Do. Not. Even. Start.

so many open for so long

anyway Yak-9K APHE removal?

10 Likes

Search up peace carvin, then understand all those programs are a fraction of the military relations between the US and Singapore

At least for the F-15SG the 428th Fighter Squadron let’s it go to the right place. The Leopard isn’t as lucky sadly

As a Singaporean. Singapore should absolutely not go to china. We are not the slightest bit related to china except the stupid and unnecessary infrastructure projects they fund so that china can drown us in debt.

If this went through i regret putting my time, effort and money into this game.
I think another review bomb seems to be needed to wake them up from their delusion.

10 Likes

If you don’t mind me asking, how would you feel about the F-15SG going to the US?

The real issue is not Singapore and China, but Gaijin’s inaction towards player feedback and deliberate disregard for Chinese vehicle data. Moreover, sending the VT4 and ‘Yamashita’ to Japan on a sensitive date such as the anniversary of China’s victory over Japan in World War II is a blatant challenge to the anti-fascist victory of World War II. Gaijin is clearly shifting the blame, so let’s not be misled

1 Like

I don’t understand why the gaijin tried to use a political gamble(Singapore TT to China) as a response to another political gamble(VT-4 to Japanese TT).
In my view, Chinese players care more about that the issues they have painstakingly raised will be treated the same as those in other tech trees, rather than being unjustly dismissed as “not a bug”. Also, they hope that the issues that have been “acknowledged” will be fixed as soon as possible.
Is it really so hard to call for a more transparent issue review mechanism and a bug-fixing schedule?

7 Likes

I dont really mind since its quite similar to the F15E other than its engines and upgraded AESA radar (and many other things but i dont remember). So long as it gets the same weapons as the currenr F15E and nothing too game changing…

2 Likes

cause is actually a pre-holiday promotion run by Xiaoheihe(小黑盒) (a Chinese distributor partnered with Gaijin) for national day, and it’s hard not to doubt the main goal here for Xiaoheihe is to clear out soon-to-expire CDK… some players discovered after purchase that the J5 CDK also includes closed-beta decals for the cn aviation tech tree. essentially, this activity has nothing to do with Gaijin itself.

1 Like

Would be a useful tool if you guys actually read it. Probably not even seen once by devs or community managers.

This post is a joke, gayjin seems to be sick once again

2 Likes