In fact, I have no objection to the VT4 being added to Thailand’s tech tree, but due to historical reasons, many Chinese players are dissatisfied with this. This is a political issue related to national sentiments, which is something Gaijin needs to consider. However, this is actually just a trigger; Chinese players have long harbored resentment towards Gaijin.
1 Like
Childish behavior on both sides
3 Likes
Yeah, massive one?
Doesn’t the problem come from yourself?If you are angry because of others, should you also be angry?
So they can’t talk about my Eurocentric view, right?
yes
1 Like
IF gaijin can put any armament on the vehicle which is fit, then we should see taiwan’s mirage 2000 having bombs, and they don’t
How about North Korea for China and South Korea for Japan seems like 2 nations that go hand in hand with each other and vehicles that serve a similar purpose and would be nice to see together, makes more sense than seeing “Russian like” Vehicles on a nation that has never touched them.
i disagree, SK should not be placed anywhere near JP
personally im pro United Korea tree, or SK as a subtree for US for instance
2 Likes
Yes, I know, but just completely ignore the political problems. We are here just to have fun and play the game and those vehicle. Ignore about those outside-world stuff. All I want is to play different War machines from around the damn world.
Bro in this thread even Chinese mains are mostly against Singapore being in their subtree and prefer Pakistan, what are you talking about
No? I don’t have to be angry at some people who have lost their minds because of being too anrgy. When people are Anrgy they just don’t think properly, and when they don’t think properly they never think before they say. Just focus and solve the problem instead of complaining.
2 Likes
Yes, we are literally just TRYING to stop people who can’t think, it’s complicated.
2 Likes
Think the key difference is generally* Singaporeans players do not want to be a part of China, Chinese players generally* do not want Singapore and other players (of lesser importance when it comes to representation) see no point in it being added to China. In fact a fair amount of complaints I’ve seen from Non-Chinese/Singaporean players is that this would just dilute the Chinese tree and take spaces that can be filled with domestic Chinese or Taiwanese vehicles (not to mention Pakistani and Bangali Vehicles). The only views I have seen that are against are either people who frankly do not care or people trying to compare this (Singapore → China) to the Thai VT-4 situation.
In the Thai VT-4 case, it has been a subtree for 6 months and the Thai players are fine with it, and so are the Japanese. Just because hundreds of Chinese people do not want the VT-4, doesn’t mean it should be cancelled. Once China sold it to Thailand, it became Thai first and Chinese second.
Also worth prefacing this by saying I’m not “one of those Westerners” as I’ve been called everytime I make a serious response on this thread.
*to stop misinterpretation
4 Likes
Because someone released a list of leaked vehicles for the next update, which included adding the Thai VT4 to the Japanese technology tree, and his previous lists were quite accurate, Chinese players assumed that the VT4 would inevitably join the Japanese technology tree (and this update was released during a sensitive period). This caused their reactions on forums and other communication platforms to be quite intense. The vast majority of Chinese players (including me) believe that the official saw their reactionsSo did not add the Thai VT4 to the Japanese technology tree in this version and added to the Chinese technology tree. One of the reasons for this is that the automatic loading positions of VT4 and VT4A1 are actually different,However, this is not the case in reality (VT4’s automatic loading machine has a higher position, so its survivability is better）
4 Likes
There is a very simple solution for this:
- Gaijin needs to fix the Chinese vehicles
- More domestic Chinese designs need to be implemented into the game
- Singapore should not be considered because there is already Bangladeshi & Pakistani vehicles to complement the Original Chinese tree and can provide help in the form of lineups, additional vehicles, etc. Just like how Finland is to the Sweden tree when it originally appears. the vehicles are not too different from the original tree, but they help with providing reinforcements, respawns, etc.
10 Likes
They need to fix everyone’s vehicles including China’s
I agree… Pakistan vehicle and Bangladeshi is already in the China tree so we shall focus on them instead of pulling more countries with not much relationship with China. And China and Taiwan itself have lot of unique vehicle that are still missing.
2 Likes
But Gaigin don’t want to make those thing because there are lazy.
So right,but what bvv_d and gaijin have done?
1 Like