Exactly it just a game… so let Gaijin add the VT4.
3rd September
Victory Day of the Chinese People’s War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression
1 Like
If this is true they should give zbd04 same 9M117M1 tandem-charge atgm from bmp3 and bmd4 which have 750mm pen(we buy it), not the ASP03(gaijin version) have only 600mm pen. in actually, APS03 using same warhead with GP105, which is same to 9M117M1, 750mm pen tandem-charge. Type-69-II should get 3bm25 which she actually have in dev server.
AND ALSO another unhistorical things for china tech tree, ZSL-92, her 25mm ZPT-90, never fit any AP, it’s design for firing APDS, as a APC.
3 Likes
where they are prejudiced, I still don’t understand, the problem is a tank going to another nation, otherwise the nation is good
At the military parade commemorating the 80th anniversary of the victory of the Chinese People’s War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression and the World Anti Fascist War
So what? Another review bomb? This time, copy-pasting the same equipment into every tree? I didn’t create several branches just so every country could have it! Seriously, this is embarrassing. I started playing this game because of the uniqueness and realism of each tree (I’ve had an account since 2013). I realized that sometimes you copy-paste because a country used it, for example: the beginnings of China, Israel, or a few British ones in Sweden. But we’re getting more and more copy-pasted.
Examples? → M44, M55, Leopard 2A4, 2A5, 2A6, T-80
Change your approach!
3 Likes
they use aim120c5, not aim120a
I love having this discussion because several American vehicles are in the Chinese tree yet there was no fuss about it. A little one sided no? Everyone has exported to some extent, so either live with it or alot of TT changes are needed. Coming from a American player, having better f16s in China when America made the same package for our air force is a bit dumb. Yet we have yet to see the f16 block 72 or better MAWS for American jets in game, there’s still hope with the addition of the SUFA in the game. Either way this whole situation is just ridiculous
3 Likes
Don’t.
8 Likes
In the game, the AIM-120A is better in 95% of situations. Do you want a nerf?
oh that gonna make the aircraft better.
no
6 Likes
It’s genuinely ironic. Just a few days ago, those Westerners who were accusing and mocking the Chinese for being “oversensitive” are now the same ones who—upon discovering Gaijin’s plan to add Singapore to the Chinese tech tree —angrily flooded the forum with over 800+ (surpassing the number of replies in the Chinese community thread), expressing their outrage and concerns about Singapore being placed under China. Is there really any fundamental difference between the two situations?
Doesn’t this reveal that the real issue lies with Gaijin? We’ve identified the problem, yet instead of questioning Gaijin’s decision-making, we turn our frustration toward each other—fueling hostility and blame between player communities.
Suppose Gaijin hadn’t given any prior notice and simply went ahead with adding Singapore to the Chinese TT (after all, Sino-Singapore relations are quite strong—the partnership has been elevated to an “All-Round High-Quality Future-Oriented Partnership,” and China has been Singapore’s largest trading partner for 12 consecutive years since 2013. Not to mention, ethnic Chinese make up about 75% of Singapore’s population). By that logic, wouldn’t Singapore deserve a place in the Chinese tech tree?
Yet the answer is clearly: no, it doesn’t belong there—because there are still too many complicating factors that can’t be ignored.
The same reasoning applies to Thailand’s placement under Japan and the VT-4’s inclusion via the Thai subtree. There may be superficial justifications, but that doesn’t mean it’s the right decision when broader contexts and sentiments are considered.
So let me ask: if one day Gaijin actually went through with adding Singapore to the Chinese TT, would you simply sit back and accept it?
7 Likes
they don’t have agm65d, only B and G
Truth nuke
1 Like
thanks bud
…what? is this some kind of gotcha? most believe that there is no reason to add a subtree since there is a LOT of actually chinese stuff left to add to the tree
4 Likes
we didn’t go around threatening to report the game to our goverments did we?
1 Like
I want historical, I want aim9p4 not the aim9l which never used, I want the FULL AirToGround payload for her, I want gaijin stop putting any armament which never used on any vehical