Information Regarding the Thai Subtree and Chinese Vehicles

And thus you can see the community voice has been mislead.
Everyone quarreling whether Singapore for CN. And no one talks about the ZTZ99 series.

17 Likes

Still no T-90S or Tor for USSR and no Leo 1A2 or KF41 for Germany.

In the same patch however you gave the US the Stingray in it’s Thai setup. Why is there no consistency between who gets what when it comes to who produces and who uses the vehicle???

28 Likes

There are several layers as to why this is a TERRIBLE PROPOSITION. Admittedly, some of the more important reasons are outside the scope of this forum, but that did not stop a certain base from lashing out.

To concentrate on the gameplay aspect of things, NAH. Imagine playing SIM or even AB & RB, you have German Leopards, French AMX, American F16s F15s (Potentially F-35 in the future) playing for REDFOR.

22 Likes

Gaijins policy is consistent inconsistency

6 Likes

Actually they do…


So, Chinese player base asked for their Chinese vehicles to be treated seriously and not neglected, and you decided to give them Singaporean vehicles…

78 Likes

Wrong, South Africa had more of enough vehicles to be added to the game, to be it’s own Tree, more so than Israel.

Gaijin the Chinese tree doesn’t need those nation, they already have their own domestic vehicles to added, there is no reason, for China to get Singaporean vehicles into the Chinese tree

3 Likes

i take it you didnt hear oif the assasins creed shadow problems either

When am I getting my own tech tree, I absolutely deserve it

2 Likes

I know that having this opinion may lead to ban but imho by agreeing with chinese player base for not adding thai versions of chinese tanks you made it all about politics. Because their opinion was in a way about politics of the past/present.

6 Likes

1 Like

Unique Chinese vehicles require work and research, Copy and Paste is easy- Gaijin

16 Likes

We heard you, thai VT-4 for sweden

16 Likes

Let’s just forget about the Issues section. The moderators come up with the most ridiculous justifications, like claiming the ‘manufacturers are unprofessional’ or that ‘16 CN502KG missiles would interfere with the landing gear.’ It’s both absurd and hilarious.

29 Likes

Just convert CountriesRegions and there will be no more HolyWars

And I would like to see TL;DR for that “wall

2 Likes

Singapore to China will not help with anything, if anything they will make the singaporeans leave now instead of the chinese due to the same concerns that china had with VT4 to japan, only now it is directly singapore to China and not Thailand VT4 to japan

5 Likes

vaguely points to former yugoslavia

4 Likes

chatgpt: gaijin add vehicle to strengthen tt
actual: gaijin dont give no golden eagle about tt, they want to add singapore to china

2 Likes

It has nothing to do with Singapore. It’s you who have misunderstood the demands of the Chinese community. The Chinese community has always been concerned about the second question of this QA

1 Like

It will piss off the entire community. Why the hell should china get F-35 AND F15SG? They don’t make them.

1 Like