There are several layers as to why this is a TERRIBLE PROPOSITION. Admittedly, some of the more important reasons are outside the scope of this forum, but that did not stop a certain base from lashing out.
To concentrate on the gameplay aspect of things, NAH. Imagine playing SIM or even AB & RB, you have German Leopards, French AMX, American F16s F15s (Potentially F-35 in the future) playing for REDFOR.
Wrong, South Africa had more of enough vehicles to be added to the game, to be it’s own Tree, more so than Israel.
Gaijin the Chinese tree doesn’t need those nation, they already have their own domestic vehicles to added, there is no reason, for China to get Singaporean vehicles into the Chinese tree
I know that having this opinion may lead to ban but imho by agreeing with chinese player base for not adding thai versions of chinese tanks you made it all about politics. Because their opinion was in a way about politics of the past/present.
Let’s just forget about the Issues section. The moderators come up with the most ridiculous justifications, like claiming the ‘manufacturers are unprofessional’ or that ‘16 CN502KG missiles would interfere with the landing gear.’ It’s both absurd and hilarious.
Singapore to China will not help with anything, if anything they will make the singaporeans leave now instead of the chinese due to the same concerns that china had with VT4 to japan, only now it is directly singapore to China and not Thailand VT4 to japan
It has nothing to do with Singapore. It’s you who have misunderstood the demands of the Chinese community. The Chinese community has always been concerned about the second question of this QA