bruh if china is going to get Taiwan AND singapore then remove the Pakistani and bangladeshi vehicles and make their own tree smh.
7 Likes
I didn’t found any kind of answer from here, but why Singapore is going for China??? Absolute nonsense.
2 Likes
I somehow don’t think Gaijin does research before picking how a nation gets treated now.
There is no connection in any way, and the tech has even less of a connection; it shouldn’t be done. And it was looking like we were moving towards a Pakistan sub-tree, even if China(like many nations) didn’t need a sub-tree, much less one without a rework.
The simple statement of this plan makes the horrible mistreatment of the BeNeLux look like a 10/10 sub-tree.
16 Likes
The topic has been diverted again. The focus of Chinese community’s has always been on the second question of QA, that is, why do Chinese vehicles have a large number of errors，And despite submitting a large amount of reasonable materials, no modifications were made at all, and even the correct materials were claimed to be incorrect
18 Likes
This is just a ridiculous bad idea,
There is already dedicated aseas threads where the unhappines and unwillinges of singaporeans was voiced out to be added to China
18 Likes
Who would ever benefit from adding SG to China?
Singaporeans understandably despise that this is even being considered, and we know that this is just an attempt at copy pasting existing vehicles for low effort filler.
SEA community gets pissed because of a political landmine, and CN community will get pissed because adding copy paste vehicles will delay the addition of domestic vehicles, or other sub-TTs that actually make sense for China.
Please Gaijin think this through once more, and stop shooting yourself in the foot for once.
33 Likes
that’s a lie, WT progression only requires a large number of premium vehicles and premium time.
9 Likes
What about all the issues with the Israeli tech tree? Almost every single tank in the tech tree suffers from at least one major historical error or bug that significantly affects the vehicle yet nothing is being said about it
6 Likes
I don’t think most Chinese players wanted Singapore in the first place, just more of their own vehicles
26 Likes
Thats the Biggest BS I ever read…
Thats why DLIRCM is still completly Broken, because you treat them all the same…
SURE…
Also, its not just one particular group of players…
But like 75% of the player…
18 Likes
So we’re deflecting while adding nations to other nations with no correlation? Time to put salt on the snail
4 Likes
Gaijin totally misunderstood Chinese players main appeal: rebalance current CN vehicles.
Or they just don’t want to.
28 Likes
China has access to North Korea, Pakistan, etc… and of course both Chinas.
They don’t need Singapore.
Especially when A-4SU could benefit a tech tree that doesn’t have an advanced CAS platform for its BR.
Put Singapore into Japan as an example, where A-4SU will make a great 9.7 - 10.7 CAS depending on its loadouts, where currently Japan lacks advanced CAS for that BR range.
Oh yeah, and I’m back to not spending money on the game until a better decision for Singapore is reached.
I hold no grudges at the end of the day.
Otherwise, I don’t have objections with the rest of the post.
21 Likes
This is the single worst idea ever. The amount of people this would anger would be massive and looks lazy
China can have vehicles from Pakistan or Bangladesh or its own vehicles which a ton of are missing
This will not go down well at all
39 Likes
The really funny and ironic thing is that it worked on the dev server, at least from my limited testing
1 Like
forum of infinity cry
8 Likes
Why put effort in when Copy and Paste saves money and adds more premiums
1 Like
Why not just remove all tech trees, place them all in 1 tree and call it “World”
31 Likes
I mean it is a dummy system (not even operational with inert warhead) so it’s not supposed to work either way
2 Likes