I somehow don’t think Gaijin does research before picking how a nation gets treated now.
There is no connection in any way, and the tech has even less of a connection; it shouldn’t be done. And it was looking like we were moving towards a Pakistan sub-tree, even if China(like many nations) didn’t need a sub-tree, much less one without a rework.
The simple statement of this plan makes the horrible mistreatment of the BeNeLux look like a 10/10 sub-tree.
The topic has been diverted again. The focus of Chinese community’s has always been on the second question of QA, that is, why do Chinese vehicles have a large number of errors,And despite submitting a large amount of reasonable materials, no modifications were made at all, and even the correct materials were claimed to be incorrect
This is just a ridiculous bad idea,
There is already dedicated aseas threads where the unhappines and unwillinges of singaporeans was voiced out to be added to China
Singaporeans understandably despise that this is even being considered, and we know that this is just an attempt at copy pasting existing vehicles for low effort filler.
SEA community gets pissed because of a political landmine, and CN community will get pissed because adding copy paste vehicles will delay the addition of domestic vehicles, or other sub-TTs that actually make sense for China.
Please Gaijin think this through once more, and stop shooting yourself in the foot for once.
What about all the issues with the Israeli tech tree? Almost every single tank in the tech tree suffers from at least one major historical error or bug that significantly affects the vehicle yet nothing is being said about it
China has access to North Korea, Pakistan, etc… and of course both Chinas.
They don’t need Singapore.
Especially when A-4SU could benefit a tech tree that doesn’t have an advanced CAS platform for its BR.
As an example, put Singapore into Japan as an example, where A-4SU will make a great 9.7 - 10.7 CAS depending on its loadouts, where currently Japan lacks advanced CAS for that BR range.
Oh yeah, and I’m back to not spending money on the game until a better decision for Singapore is reached.
I hold no grudges at the end of the day.
Otherwise, I don’t have objections with the rest of the post.
Still no T-90S or Tor for USSR and no Leo 1A2 or KF41 for Germany.
In the same patch however you gave the US the Stingray in it’s Thai setup. Why is there no consistency between who gets what when it comes to who produces and who uses the vehicle???