Also Singapore in the Chinese Tech Tree would not be a great move. North Korea or even Pakistan would be much better suited and fit much better as a sub-tech tree for China. Singaporean vehicles like Leopard 2RI, F-15SG, F-16C/D would better supplement and compliment the Japanese tech tree more than anything.
No thanks, I don’t agree with the methods or the terms used in this matter.
I won’t comment on the VT-4, or whatever it’s called, or on the sensitivity of the Chinese about the topic, but I really didn’t like how the whole thing was used to ride the wave of speculation on bug reports.
Do you even realise how out of touch this is?
In the reply about an incident about adding VT4 to japan; they set the tone and talk about introducing Leo2 and F15 to the chinese tree? What the actual?
well i can say why canada and australia arent, the german and america mains are gatekeeping asses over the abrams (which according to them sucks anyways so who cares) and the leopard 2 had to be a top tier german premium for reasons (im ok with this im a certified leopard tank hater)
the rest is kinda illogical as it doesnt really affect the status quo of any other trees too hard other than singapore
Currently, it would be touchy to do so given the geopolitical context. But generally? Yes, as neither Ukraine nor Russia were countries back then, and were both powerful governing bodies of the Soviet Union. Former Soviet republic goes with a fellow Soviet republic (Ukraine and Belarus at least. As Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan and the Baltics were less autonomous.)
I don’t care too much about what tech goes to what tree at this point, the more time passes the more I just care about which vehicles come to the game. And I’m also a mirage fan so it would surely be nice to see the rose ones
Russia should probably get a T84 and maybe have a US event one to represent the 4 that the US received in 2003
And China get a M1A2T that Taiwan purchased