My dear Friends, this discussion is useless. We need to do what we have already done and solve the problem. They will continue to push this idea forward, and the community managers will not defend us or respect our ideas.
Fr it’s a shame
most of the planet was in my countries empire, you dont want to play that game.
3 Likes
Yes an F16 that at the time due to political reasons shouldnt even be there. go read up on that specific F16 and the agreements between the US and Taiwan because it flat out shouldnt even be there. I called for that not to be added when it got announced
I don’t think it would be problem because We already have ROCAF F-16A Block 20 MLU.
There is another problems they doesn’t model ROCs F-16A correctly, just like AIM-9Ms, AIM-120C-5, A2G loadouts tho.
1 Like
Gaijin is already playing that game with south africa, canada, australia, india…
I wish they were playing that game with Canada & the ANZACs.
Sadly, those three nations need to fight everyone but British players(and even then, they need to fight some UK mains) for a home, it seems.
1 Like
Sure. And TAIWAN is another sensitive issues to China.
I’ve seen a lot of speech in this post want to express Taiwan is not a part of China and should be removed from CN tech tree
3 Likes
Let just rename China to “Qing dynasty”
1 Like
oh get rid of india .it doesnt fit as a subtree at all and its just soviet C&P slop
Canada, SA and Australia are as important part of the british tree as england is. Im willing to trade the indian subtree for small bug fixes and id trade the SA subtree to garantee canada and australia are kept in the correct (British) tree
2 Likes
9 Likes
Aside ground vehicles, China also still has aircraft that still could be added, which is also within the generation this game operates with.
besides their J11 variants.
they still can add aircraft like these
FTC2000G
There is also the F-CK from Taiwan
2 Likes
Also, When you try to add PAK F-16 to China. Some players may cring: NO NATO WEAPONS FOR CHINA
Uhhhh did anyone tell them what vehicles Singapore uses. :)))))
5 Likes
Well technically China is accurate as it refers both to the popular republic of china (china) and the republic of china (taiwan)
Piss off everyone simulator
3 Likes
India could be so much better as a nation, hell even as a sub it could be made far better. But no Gaijin chose to add copypaste premium slop
So are we getting the VT-4 or not?
Also Singapore in the Chinese Tech Tree would not be a great move. North Korea or even Pakistan would be much better suited and fit much better as a sub-tech tree for China. Singaporean vehicles like Leopard 2RI, F-15SG, F-16C/D would better supplement and compliment the Japanese tech tree more than anything.
8 Likes
No thanks, I don’t agree with the methods or the terms used in this matter.
I won’t comment on the VT-4, or whatever it’s called, or on the sensitivity of the Chinese about the topic, but I really didn’t like how the whole thing was used to ride the wave of speculation on bug reports.
Agreed since I believe that South Korea is going to the US as a subtree