China doesnt need a subtree to do this… they literally have enough domestic options. but hey lets potentially give them a Leopard 2SG that they NEVER used lmao. might be down as a Singaporean tank but its still gunna be slapped into a Chinese TT and have that association, an association it NEVER had.
3 Likes
Hell no. It doesn’t make any sense at all and its disrespectful.
Well, why not call for enforcement from Chinese while trying to get through an issue or something else? United as a whole, we should.
Quite a few Chinese players are fond of not only CHN TT but also others as far as I know.
1 Like
I would rather have an African Union
1 Like
As a Chinese I love Pakistan. But if I’m BVVD. I’ll think it’s not a good idea to add a whole PAK tree to China.
There won’t be many things diffirent to CN vehicles.
Maybe only Type 85 tanks ?
Also, When you try to add PAK F-16 to China. Some players may cring: NO NATO WEAPONS FOR CHINA
1 Like
there is already an F-16 in CN tree though
I think you forgot the existence of taiwan entirely
We really need more Jeff
1 Like
they literally have a f-16 with aamrams rn in the game as we speak
My dear Friends, this discussion is useless. We need to do what we have already done and solve the problem. They will continue to push this idea forward, and the community managers will not defend us or respect our ideas.
Fr it’s a shame
most of the planet was in my countries empire, you dont want to play that game.
3 Likes
Yes an F16 that at the time due to political reasons shouldnt even be there. go read up on that specific F16 and the agreements between the US and Taiwan because it flat out shouldnt even be there. I called for that not to be added when it got announced
I don’t think it would be problem because We already have ROCAF F-16A Block 20 MLU.
There is another problems they doesn’t model ROCs F-16A correctly, just like AIM-9Ms, AIM-120C-5, A2G loadouts tho.
1 Like
Gaijin is already playing that game with south africa, canada, australia, india…
I wish they were playing that game with Canada & the ANZACs.
Sadly, those three nations need to fight everyone but British players(and even then, they need to fight some UK mains) for a home, it seems.
1 Like
Sure. And TAIWAN is another sensitive issues to China.
I’ve seen a lot of speech in this post want to express Taiwan is not a part of China and should be removed from CN tech tree
3 Likes
Let just rename China to “Qing dynasty”
1 Like
oh get rid of india .it doesnt fit as a subtree at all and its just soviet C&P slop
Canada, SA and Australia are as important part of the british tree as england is. Im willing to trade the indian subtree for small bug fixes and id trade the SA subtree to garantee canada and australia are kept in the correct (British) tree
2 Likes
9 Likes