We ain’t reading all that
The entire article lacks any sincerity.
For the VT-4 or any other chinese vehicle in Thai techtree.There is no definitive answer as to whether it will be implemented in Japan tech tree.
For Chinese vehicles:
What kind of source makes you clearly know CM502 have a explosive radius of 0.4 m? while any other HE-rocket weapon did not have this limit?
What kind of source makes you clearly know VT-4 has a higher reloader than VT-4A1?
What kind of source makes you clearly know LMUR can lock weak point of a vehicle when CM502 and AGM179 cannot?
What kind of source makes you clearly know ZBD04A’s outer fuel tank can blow up the whole vehicle?
What kind of source makes you clearly know chinese helicopters RWR cannot identify any air based radar but can only show AI?
What kind of source makes you clearly know VT-4A1’s ERAs are glued together.
What kind of source makes you clearly know VT-5 can be penetrate by 7.62mm bullet on it’s hull’s shoulder?
What kind of source makes you clearly know ZTZ-99A’s turret armor’s armor layers are floating in air and the lower part of it’s composite armor has only 200- KE protection?
And about Issue report?
When Chinese players reported MBT-2000’s hull has a KE protection of 550mm. The manager says" Only Al-khalid 1 can do so"
and When Al-khalid 1 is in game. there’s no diffirent between it and MBT-2000.
When Chinese players reported Chinese tanks spall liner just the same time as other players reported Leopard 2’s. You fit it for leo 2 in the next day and Chinese tanks still lack it untill today?
Still:
When Every other countries got IR-Guided air to ground missile. Where’s Chinese YJ-83B YJ-704?
When Other countries got ESA jet. Especially Su-30SM and Rafale. Where’s J-16 and J-10C? Oh you will bring em to game after F-22 and F-35, right?
“we always analyze feedback and will change things if it improves progression through the game, improves balance, or makes gameplay more interesting and enjoyable.”
This is what you called balance and enjoyable. Right?!
Put aside your prejudices and arrogance GAIJIN. or I will never forgive you.
33 Likes
yall use soap in 2025? i use golden eagle bar to shower
1 Like
Well, that reaction is exactly the same as when Chinese vehicles are rumored to be added to the Japanese tech tree, isn’t it? Yet most non-Chinese community players criticize Chinese players for overreacting, even though they themselves are pretty much overreacting right now with the statement about “Singapore going to China”. What’s the double standards here?
9 Likes
Also Gaijin: Reload time is just for balancing, so realism doesn’t come with it.
Smin1080p_WT did say that last year, so 6.8sec for ztz99 when?
1 Like
he was replying to a suggestion for a joint Thai and South Korea tree
Do not try to put words in other people mouths
He said people should loses there anger not that Korea should go to Japan
2 Likes
Yse Don t need Singapore s tanks, need more Chinese domestically produced tanks and aircraft.
He’s on holiday
31 Likes
good for him tbh, he dont have to deal with all this we love smin
2 Likes
Should Singaporean vehicles added to;
- Japan
- China
- Israel
- Other (Seperate ASEAN Tree etc.)
0
voters
1 Like
A) ive already stated numerous times, in this thread and in the T-84/VT-4 thread, that I would 100% support the idea of not adding CHINESE VT-4 to Japan on historical grounds. the tank in question is however THAI VT-4, not CHINESE.
B) there is difference to opposing additon of entire subtree before its added, and opposing addition of single vehicle to the subtree thats already in game.
As a Brit main. Gaijin will always chose Sub-TT with easy C&P over fixing their existing vehicles
1 Like
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
poor magazine2
free my boy
Is India in the British tech tree acceptable? And NATO equipment in the Chinese tech tree unacceptable?
No double standards from the European community.
3 Likes
where’s the option for a seperate ASEAN tree? and if you want it to be representative, “Other”
1 Like
congrats to Smin and sorry to magazine for being left with this disaster
well… have a nice trip?
I’m not intended to call him for a response, I will edit that later.
should be a “no sub/technically belonging” choice, sub is not the only choice
1 Like