English !!!
1 Like
English please, even the Chinese are managing to speak in english as well
1 Like
Im not from thailand either and I think not adding thai VT-4 to thailand is unfair lol, what is this argument? Some nations wont simply have the neccesary presence online to make their opinion seem like majority.
3 Likes
We didn’t say we don’t want Singapore tree, stop mis represent us as if u care
1 Like
This is a useless argument thread. Arguing over who is more Singaporean is an argument that goes nowhere and achieves nothing.
1 Like
Finally someone who’s cooking
1 Like
i choose “Should Sinaporean vehicles added to;” tyvm
its obviously neither of these, its going to be australia
nvm thread got cooked
2 Likes
Did I not just write an 1100 word soapbox?
1 Like
not all of them have evolved for that yet. there were multiple msg in chinese
1 Like
3 other chinese users said they didnt want the tree. So is 3 greater than 1? Do you want to scroll up?
Why Japan? Signapore is one of the few nations that would actually be viable for Israel and they don’t have many options.
Yeah look at these crying for Singapore goes to China, and “don’t care about Chinese ppl’s sensitive point since it’s a game anyway”
Pure DOUBLE STANDARD AND HYPOCRISY
7 Likes
I dont think most WT players even know what soap is let alone a soapbox
I didn’t see it
We ain’t reading all that
The entire article lacks any sincerity.
For the VT-4 or any other chinese vehicle in Thai techtree.There is no definitive answer as to whether it will be implemented in Japan tech tree.
For Chinese vehicles:
What kind of source makes you clearly know CM502 have a explosive radius of 0.4 m? while any other HE-rocket weapon did not have this limit?
What kind of source makes you clearly know VT-4 has a higher reloader than VT-4A1?
What kind of source makes you clearly know LMUR can lock weak point of a vehicle when CM502 and AGM179 cannot?
What kind of source makes you clearly know ZBD04A’s outer fuel tank can blow up the whole vehicle?
What kind of source makes you clearly know chinese helicopters RWR cannot identify any air based radar but can only show AI?
What kind of source makes you clearly know VT-4A1’s ERAs are glued together.
What kind of source makes you clearly know VT-5 can be penetrate by 7.62mm bullet on it’s hull’s shoulder?
What kind of source makes you clearly know ZTZ-99A’s turret armor’s armor layers are floating in air and the lower part of it’s composite armor has only 200- KE protection?
And about Issue report?
When Chinese players reported MBT-2000’s hull has a KE protection of 550mm. The manager says" Only Al-khalid 1 can do so"
and When Al-khalid 1 is in game. there’s no diffirent between it and MBT-2000.
When Chinese players reported Chinese tanks spall liner just the same time as other players reported Leopard 2’s. You fit it for leo 2 in the next day and Chinese tanks still lack it untill today?
Still:
When Every other countries got IR-Guided air to ground missile. Where’s Chinese YJ-83B YJ-704?
When Other countries got ESA jet. Especially Su-30SM and Rafale. Where’s J-16 and J-10C? Oh you will bring em to game after F-22 and F-35, right?
“we always analyze feedback and will change things if it improves progression through the game, improves balance, or makes gameplay more interesting and enjoyable.”
This is what you called balance and enjoyable. Right?!
Put aside your prejudices and arrogance GAIJIN. or I will never forgive you.
36 Likes
yall use soap in 2025? i use golden eagle bar to shower
1 Like
Well, that reaction is exactly the same as when Chinese vehicles are rumored to be added to the Japanese tech tree, isn’t it? Yet most non-Chinese community players criticize Chinese players for overreacting, even though they themselves are pretty much overreacting right now with the statement about “Singapore going to China”. What’s the double standards here?
9 Likes
Also Gaijin: Reload time is just for balancing, so realism doesn’t come with it.
Smin1080p_WT did say that last year, so 6.8sec for ztz99 when?
1 Like