Information Regarding the Thai Subtree and Chinese Vehicles

Nice work! Also, I love that you included Ranks I-III, as they should have always been included. Honestly, I was looking over Chile for Israel, and they might just work as a Sub TT along with Singapore. Chile would certainly help out in the Bluewater Naval department, considering Israel’s current Bluewater TT would be three Destroyers in total. With Chile, they’d get a couple of good Cruisers and Destroyers… and at minimum two Battleships

3 Likes

Subtrees are added for the reasons explained in this post we’re discussing. They help create lineups to make a tree more competitive, fill missing gaps, provide gameplay variety, etc. Chile helps extend Israel to rank 1 in all its trees, so it’s useful. Now, if there are people who don’t like copy/paste, it’s a shame because that’s always been the case and will continue to be the case. I’m also not going to explain the close ties between Chile and Israel here, as I’ve made several suggestions for that in the forum, where you can read more.

2 Likes

In 1992, a Stingray was sent to Chile for testing by the army, but after the tests, the army showed no interest and did not purchase it. So, like other vehicles in the game, the Stingray can be added to the Chilean subtree as a tested vehicle.

image

3 Likes

Thank you very much for your opinion. The same would happen in the air tree, Chile would help Israel achieve its ranks I-III, and Singapore could help with the higher ranks. In the naval field, Chile was a continental power for a few years with its battleships, cruisers, and destroyers, so it could help Israel achieve its blue-water naval tree as well. Even in helicopters we have something to offer.

2 Likes

Interesting this could be a chance for Gaijin to make a model of the first prototype that was used for foreign demonstrations of the tank. That way the US Stingray could actually be changed to an American owned tank instead of a Thai service vehicle.

Then shouldn’t all players join in to make gaijin improve? Do staying silent or calling the people protesting against the problem a nuisance help gaijin actually improve? If gaijin, for example, listened to the demands and changed the bug reporting system, then it is something that would benefit all players

7 Likes

Yea so we should work together to solve the issue instead of being divided. Gaijin wants the playerbase to be divided so that it doesn’t actually have to solve anything. Is this what you want too?

the best way to solve this problem is just to add a rest of the world tech tree and add everything to it

Chinese players don’t care about Singapore ,only care about the fairness of chinese car ,gaijin winwin ,many people don’t care about the fairness of chinese car ,just care about “way Singapore belongs to China” ,however gaijin didn’t put any Singapore in China or war thunder .gaijin didn’t give the fairness of chinesse car and no new car from Singapore(and others) ,also provoked a conflict within the player .
On the Singapore ,gaijin just gained some notoriety but didn’t have to do anything .

3 Likes

Case and point, i could make a paragraph like yours about most nations in the game. Yet you don’t know that cause you don’t care about other nation, the only time china got particularly shafted was back when that garbage tech mod was around. Like lmao “tor isn’t s competent top tier” it was better than what most other nations had.

1 Like

Hell yeah we should but until we stop infighting over vs nothing’s going to change, but right now I think a more pressing issue is ground RB balancing and rewards, what’s the point in adding top tier spaas with ranges up to 90 kilometers when radars can’t see over the horizon?

Japan isn’t in NATO.

2 Likes

Did/Do u really read? Haven’t I point out Fr and IT also?
The first two points I brought up on double standard treating two trees without pretending, I’ve only witnessed once OTHER than CN tree, that is: planning to give Ger. tree SK105 with stabilizer but not Fr tree, even the idea of oscillating turret was a Fr thing, and when Fr mains complained and boycotted about this, evetually, chose to give both nation a SK105 but confiscated the stabilizer on test server.

Then about TOR, it was a 11.7 thing go against other top-tier aircraft without even a thermal. And the G pull of the missile was so incompetent back then for like 2 years until HQ17 came out, that in the dev stream, it failed to shoot down target in test drive. U think it’s better? U even played CN tree thing?

I didn’t expect u to make the accusation PERSONALLY.
This is the vehicles I possess, and U say I don’t care about other nation?


Then HOW about U?
And U know what I like about this forum, and think it’s better than Tieba or Reddit?
Cuz it can quickly shows what others really got,
Eh? Mr. Z who ONLY played 5 games with China on RESERVE vehicles?
Yet you don’t know that cause you don’t care about other nation”, This sentence, I give it back to U.

Those HYPOs who don’t even play China whilst yapping “China is better ver. of USSR, too StRoNg!” Duh…

11 Likes

To keep things fresh and exciting for players, we added copy paste.

never said china has no problems though, what i did say is that its about as fucked as most other nations in the game, the one thing i think should come to china is a fleshed out subtree like great britain’s south africa.
but mate stop bringing up the tor, it wasnt any worse than what others had to deal with at the time, not to mention it was during a patch that was CAS heaven much like kh38mt was (and to a lesser extent is now), if you think china is somehow this hugely mistreated subtree then i dont know what you want from me i simply disagree, if you’d make the argument that you think it should get the same treatment as russia, america and germany then i would agree with you, but i wouldnt say china is somehow worse treated the great britain, japan, france, sweden or israel or italy, you might make the ef2k and rafale argument and id say youre right and to that i would point to literally everything else about the trees, and for israel there really is no comparison, the newest thing theyve got the spyder the gimped to all hell and has broken missiles and the only good thing they had being the 16 spikes just got powercreeped into oblivion.

He not have,Even the most one department has only 39 elite vehicles, which means that he has never played any department seriously.

3 Likes

That’s the most sound choice possible for both parties, you could probably add a 11.3 or 11.7 squadron vehicle

ah yes, are we competing to suffer more now? because ONE group dared to do something about it therefore they’re wrong and shouldn’t eek a word? cool bro keep riding gaijin

5 Likes

ah yes thats definetly why i mention it.

To be fair this is what China is in reality, so it’s easy to make assumptions without knowing all the issues Chinese vehilces have in game.

2 Likes