i was gonna like your post but you took out the funny part :(
1 Like
tl;dr
When Chinese players complain Gaijin should listen, but for other nations it’s ok if they don’t listen
1 Like
This is not a reason to listen to anyone. We are here to solve the problem. If the problem really exists, shouldn’t we be the one who solves it with BVVD?
1 Like
- Chinese players don’t want Chinese vehicles to appear in Japan because our two countries still have unresolved historical issues. For example, what would it mean if a vehicle sold by the US to South Korea appeared in North Korea’s vehicle tree?
- We are a country capable of independently producing sixth-generation fighter jets and space stations. Do you think a country with such advanced technology could have a tank with only 577mm penetration? How could we possibly allow a tank gun with a 7.1-second reload time and 577mm penetration to become the backbone of our army? We even joked that we hoped NATO countries would actually consider our tank guns to be industrial waste.
- The vehicles in the lower-level rooms were either military aid from the US at the time or battlefield captures. Many of these vehicles are still on display in our museums today.
- For information on the reasons for the appearance of vehicles in the Chinese tech tree after the Cold War, please refer to this document.
2 Likes
Bro stop spamming we get it you are mad. But until you have to wait for a an armor fix for over 2 years then there is no reason to be this angry over a game
5 Likes
honestly i wouldnt really agree w this
VT4 is operate by mainland china yes, but now that is no longer the case, ur country has ceased VT4 production in favour for other newer and better tank
the VT4 was bought by THAILAND, which is an ally and a sub tree of japan, there should no reason that thai player that specifically play japan to get the thai sub tree cannot get their own mbts that they(again, THAILAND) operate(which is the THAI VT4)
6 Likes
Our VT4 tank is for Thailand, not for the Japanese, so why does it appear on the Japanese tree?
1 Like
Thailand is a subtree of Japan
6 Likes
“Everyone that disagrees with me is a racist”
LOL! Nice gaslighting.
12 Likes
Okay, where is it?
Thailand. Is. A. Subtree. Of. Japan.
Thai vehicles go to the Japanese tree.
Get it?
Gaijin didn’t listen to the Brits when they rejected the Bhishma, so why should they now listen to the Chinese players?
2 Likes
well
get this
So is this a problem, shouldn’t this be solved?
1 Like
Why would south korean vehicles be in north korean techtree?
5 Likes
If you can get Gaijin to remove the Indian vehicles from the British tree and give India its own seperate tech tree we can talk about the “problem” of the VT-4 being a potential addition to the Thai subtree (which is located in the Japanese tree)
2 Likes
“It’s Korea, innit?”
5 Likes
Atatatata, hush now. I want to hear it from our chines friend here.
2 Likes
Please, I’m a Chinese player, how am I supposed to understand the relationship between Britain and India, so when Indian vehicles appeared in Britain, we didn’t say anything!
This isn’t about relationships, this is about consistency.
They should be treating all nations equally, which means that after not giving in to the complaints of the British players, they now shouldn’t give in to the complaints of the Chinese players.
1 Like
Gaijin already announced that Thailand is a “child” (subtree) of Japan (main tree)