They said this in the topic for the second testing phase and this third testing phase is the next test window is it not?
oh mb didn’t see that
I guess it is
Yes, 12 guys with M16’s shooting down MASSIVE planes, very realistic
That’s how the US lost Vietnam . . . . . lol
Oh wait, sorry I forgot . . . this is MODERN warfare, only takes one
peasent with a RPG(on a moped for good measure!) . . . . my bad . . . .
My point was(is) I think adding more “foot” to foot soldier/infantry
would be a more realistic approach and also improve gameplay, for infantry.
If they want to develop a Full On mode for “Combined Arms” utilizing ALL
military aspects/assets the game has to offer . . . that would be a different thing
altogether . . . to me anyway.
What is wrong with Infantry just being that, infantry? . . . all I am asking .
Please WWI and maybe some later eras as well(Korean Conflict, Vietnam).
Mashing all these modern weapons into a close quarters infantry style
set up seems pretty silly.
There are a lot of people that like the earlier ranks/tiers in all game modes
more than the high tier modern stuff. It’s not a sekrit or a sin, just personal
preference. The game’s dynamic was set up early on for ranks I - V, worked
pretty well. As time went on, more vehicles, ranks and nations, things changed.
No big deal, was to be expected. But when everything else was added to the game,
tanks with tank CBT, naval CBT and even helis . . . they did not add the highest
possible BR and tiers first . . . never not once. Why do you suppose that is??
My guess is it’s the same carrot on a stick they have been dangling the past
6+ years . . . . modern warfare.
It has been the business model for a good long time now.
All I am asking is maybe for some more options of different eras
that have more of a focus on game play and less on Whizz Bang!
Does that make me a terrible person? . . . if so, then I guess I am.
I don’t think fun game play and some more variety is a big ask . . .
So did you forget about MANPADS? These gun ships do not have a very long range
Key word: “Should” .
Plans can (and evidently do) change.
I hope the console players get to join in testing soon though :)
1 Like
No, not really . . . the comment - “only takes one
peasent with a RPG(on a moped for good measure!)”
was a very broad & generic reference, nothing specific.
But the fact you go directly to “MANPADS” just proves my point.
@Stona_WT Is the idea of adding aircraft to infantry mode no longer being discussed, or is it still possible to hope that aircraft will be added to this mode?
A game so bloated that every addition introduces 2 bugs and 2 historical inaccuracies, maps, br system and game modes decade old and incredibly in need of massive re-work (Also naval, that is a horrific abomination of a game branch). What does Gaijin do? add a new massive game branch that will basically ensure the game will die before anything actually gets better. Great job Gaijin, keep adding half assed slop until the game becomes too big to even function and then kill it…
1 Like
sorry to hear that but too busy having fun with Inf
Yeah i know, i did not mean to imply it was some kind of promise. I was simply wondering why the plans were changed and if consoles will still be able to participate in the CBT or if we have to wait for open beta testing.
i hope so too, hopefully next testing phase.
1 Like
I really dont understand what issue you have with this
2 Likes
War Thunder is a WWII based game , War Thunder is a WWII and Cold war based game , War Thunder is a WWII , Cold war and Modern warfare based game , War Thunder has become just a big mess with adding things we dont need. Just go play the campaigns , single missions , World war mode , i havent seen it few years now , Custom battles. Infantry is plain useless
not really Inf is a vital part of War
1 Like
WT had korean war jets since beta
1 Like
Hopefully soon I need me some technicals
2 Likes
Is infantry thunder how we will finally get a technical tree
I still think this is an absolute waste of development time. You should have put these people to work on implementing bug reports, updating vehicle models, making new maps/vehicles/game modes, etc.
How much of the community really wanted to play COD in their realistic vehicle game? Most of the people I know just wanted AI infantry.
1 Like
a lot more I know wanted Inf in wt that we could play as