HAL Tejas Mk.1 large variety of Air-to-Air Missile and Air-to-Ground armament from Israel, NATO, Indian & russian
Personally I think HAL Tejas Mk.1 great lightweight Multirole fighter for british tech tree in the future
How are different between Tejas Mk.1 FOC & IOC standard ?
An early MiG-29K with R-27ER and R-73E would be perfect for 12.7, being better than the overtiered G and SMT and IMO would have been a much better addition than the JAS-39C and its entirely fictional armament.
The Rafale and Su-30MKI are quite a bit more capable than anything in-game largely due to their armaments, but would be worthwhile additions eventually once the game gets up to that point.
Nah sometimes it needs to be limit plus why need MiG-29? when UK can have better choice such as CF-18 or Eurofighter
ATD-X / F-2 ? F-1? are those jokes to you?
An Indian sub-tree for the UK makes sense, but I don’t think the UK should get vehicles they didn’t actually use. Same thing goes for American vehicles in the Taiwanese sub-tree and “Argentinian vehicles” in the German tree. Keep it domestic, or make it substantially unique, but no copy-paste.
Then remove the British planes in the American tree
lets remove Israel while we are at it
and all of Japan top tier along with Italy
Get rid of the East German stuff as well
Yes. I agree. Also we should remove a lot of the vehicles in the Chinese and Swedish trees.
Alternatively, we could just give everyone sub-trees and make every nation the same. I think that the U.S. could use a Pantsir and R3-T20.
What they should have done is made nations like italy, sweden, israel, and china subtrees or stand-alone vehicles in pre-existing nations, (e.g. Italy and sweden as German sub-trees, china as russian subtrees, and israel as a U.S. sub-tree).
Those that are premium? Cuz there is no aircraft in US Free TT that have not been used by USAF/USN/USMC corps, or even ANG.
But feel free to find me an exemple of UK aircraft in the non premium TT,…
Have been used by Marines → next?
Built under license : 102 AV-8A aircrafts
AV-8C → is modernisation of 47 aircrafts out of the previous 102
Both differs from Harrier GR.1/3’s by internal equipments (engines/ejection seat/avionics).
Can you not read the guy want to remove all copy paste planes no matter if they used them or not
That’s not a copy-paste ^^"
And btw,… i’m pretty ok with him → stop giving some nations things that are not theirs.
Regroup all of those Unique vehicules and create one large TT of world unique vehicules.
Which is made by who
Pratt&Whitney(AV-8A so also the AV-8C) instead of Rolls Royce (Harrier GR.1/3’s)
No the American Harriers have always used a Rolls Royce Pegasus
I get some nations need copy paste to survive, but Britain is not one of them. Indian stuff can go to GB when and only when it is British in origin or Unique to India. Any other case, it should go to the country of origin. I also think that with Russia, the US, Germany, and even parts of nations like Sweden (why does it need a 2A6 if it has the STRV 122s? It’s not like Germany got a second 2A6) or China.
They can
Engines have been licensed to Pratt &Whitney, i can assure you that my boy,…
Do your search,…
Bristol-Siddeley Pegasus Mk. 5 Turbofan Engine | National Air and Space Museum.
The unique Pegasus engine powers all versions of the Hawker Siddeley Harrier multi-role military aircraft. Rolls-Royce licensed Pratt & Whitney to build the Pegasus for US built versions. However Pratt & Whitney never completed any engines, with all new build being manufactured by Rolls-Royce in Bristol, England.