hmm probably just a on spot stupid idea , i just thought since India has stronger ties with Ussr and Israel and Israel has less vehicles ingame .
Please for the love of god, NO
Though at one point Italy was also a sub-tt of Germany.
Despite a lot of people not liking the idea of sub-tech tree for USSR, which I can’t imagine why, Czech has another vehicle inside the USSR tech tree with the L-39ZA Albatros, is the third if I’m not wrong.
The chances of this being reality is even higher now unless Gaijin actually makes a Eastern Europe tech tree with Poland, Ukraine and everyone else that may be missing and isn’t represented in-game which I doubt frankly.
I dont have anything against USSR getting a subtree.
Im against Czechoslovakia being that subtree.
Might as well add israel to germany.
US had mekravas and magach before Israel, UK had shotkal before israel and strv81 before sweden.
Unless its official i hope its only temporal placement.
1 Like
Me too, but I’m afraid as a tech tree may fall under same Israel’s situation despite offering a lot with vehicle modernization.
Eh, we shall see.
Until its official its just speculations anyway.
You already said the reason why it is a subtree already. Don’t try to use Israel as a precedent because implementation of Israel tree are also a mistake
I don’t think Israel tanks like the mekravas which were in US TT was as popular as the Indian T80 bhishma, I over a period of 2 months saw a lot of the T80 bhishma and jaguar (Indian) combo a lot , so I feel that lot of players have actually liked the introduction of those 2
And another reason for using israel was due to the false info I got from some players who said India doesn’t have a lot of vehicles other than the new ones that can be added to rank 6-8
But actually India has Atleast as many vehicles as Israel in reality it have atleast 2x the amount of vehicles in Israel ,even starting from rank 1
also confirmed not to be a sub tree by Smin
India could bring up loads of ground vehicles in game, a lot of unique ones.
just ignore some of the premium wooden bmp2 mockup variants
Yes ,I saw that right after I Post the first message lol , I also saw another popular post where India’s LCH was suggested that was moved to devs it seems since it doesn’t allow to reply or vote in that post
1 Like
Should’ve either been independent or a subtree to Israel, where it is in the UK is just a lose-lose situation
It at least seems that Czechoslovakia can hold up on its own better than most subtree suggestions, especially if Poland is with them (plus you could possibly throw the Baltics and/or Ukraine in idk)
The only issue is naval, but by looking at a certain 3 nations, it should be fine.
If we were to avoid a Israel tree situation of a hollow tree, India would’ve been a fine option as they do have a history of cooperation and they would fit each with India using quite a good chunk of soviet and original vehicles with the odd western upgrades while Israel used mostly western and original stuff with the odd eastern equipment.
For now having India in the UK kinda feels like a waste, like Romania in Italy (which imo, should’ve been the main subtree, not Hungary which should’ve been part of a V4 tree ).
1 Like
Between all options only Poland could have better options of unique vehicles than the Baltics and other regions, you see, if Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia is added, it would just be like how BeNeLux was implemented, a swarm of Leopards.
Not to throw cold water on you, but did you think about the possibility that they bringing them together is just because those are the top tier they can get for free? And being a independent tree is not just about having enough vehicle to add in the game, but more importantly is having enough of UNIQUE VEHICLE to add that will make player play them. And let’s me guess what the vehicle that you said can be added to the tree, Centurion Variant, Vickers, T-55, T-72, Arjun and T-90. So is they unique enough? Not really.
I’m not suggesting the balts as a dominant portion of the tree, they could supply the unique low tier stuff and the some other higher tier unique stuff (Latvian Scimitar with spikes and the Lithuanian RBS-70 NG SHORAD) and leave the rest to Poland and Czechoslovakia, I am in no way advocating for x vehicle with y country’s markings.
Also I’m gonna bite, none of the balts currently operate any leopards (ifrc Lithuania will operate 2A8s in the future), closest thing is the Latvian T-55AMs which could be supplied by Poland in the tt as they both used the exact modification and Latvia never upgraded them beyond what they were delivered as.
Please use already existing threads