Posts like that genuinely make me concerned for people’s mental health.
1 Like
Your first video clearly shows you getting hit in the engine by a IFVs and A ZSU, and dying to a 30f26 round. Why would you try to use this as proof?
None of this changes how gaijin designed the Abrams in this game and has ignored bug report after bug report after bug report. You could have a Kill death ratio of 20 to 1 and that isn’t the point the O.P made. How you are trying to ignore this is showing me how much of a deceitful person you are.
Can the same be done back to Russian and Israeli tanks? I already know you don’t know simple physics a 30F26 round hitting a M2 browning gun mount isn’t going to be able to pierce the stop of a Abrams hull, or did you forget that waves from explosions follow the least path of resistance? I know alot of people who play this game who obviously never picked up a physics book think that this is possible. A high explosive round detonating and its shockwave phases through the room of an Abrams instant killing the entire crew?
Meanwhile in Iraq…
1 Like
Your posts make me concerned for your I.Q.
Though words coming from someone hiding behind an alt account.
Would have held more weight if you weren’t scared yourself though.
They won’t give the M1 Abrams M900 or M833 because this would stop all that and give the M1 Abrams an equal footing.
I believe we’re starting to argue about different things. You don’t need to convince me the Abrams is good, i’m not calling it bad, just not fun, at least the M1 version that i played.
The clips you showed, it’s the M1A1, which if x-ray doesn’t lie, it has double the armor of the previous variant, so i guess it’s only right that it can bounce more shots. I can’t talk about it since i don’t own it. My experience is only with the first version
To summarize my experiences:
The Abrams: get shot and survive with black turret ring, engine, transmission and 2 crew killed plus 30 sec repair in which i may or may not die.
The sovjets: get shot and die or survive unscathed
Surviving random shots that should’ve killed you sticks out more that surviving in critical condition. Getting in a hulldown position and peaking out to take a shot only to be met with repair time is making me roll my eyes and i seriously consider returning to hangar, even thou i survive and i can still have an amazing game
2 Likes
Unfortunately for your argument, I still have the full recording.
Hits 1-4: 2S38
Hit 5: T-55
Hit 6: T-72B
Hit 7: Type 90
Hit 8-9: T-80B
Hit 10: Type 90
Hit 11,12 and finally 13: TURMS-T
I got as many kills as I took hits in my M1A1 that round.
That’s not the engine compartment:
Bug reports on all vehicles are left unresolved, you’re once again cherry-picking the M1 Abrams here. There are dozens of reports submitted every hour, for every day, for every week, for every month.
That being said, the M1’s have still received a number of bug fixes over time, including sight magnification, armour buffs/fixes for every model, reload rate improvements, updated and improved ammo loadouts, etc. etc.
It’s sartt.
And I would not be surprised if his main account got banned.
4 Likes
Oh no I’m not trying to, I’m just pointing out that your example with the shots taken could’ve easily gone the other way.
I wouldn’t put too much stock in the outcome of singular engagements, it’s why I prefer to gather larger data-sets like this:
The turret armour goes from 400mm @ 60 degree frontal arc to 450mm @ 60 degree frontal arc, all whilst going up by 0.7 BR, so the armour in theory should be weaker relative to it’s opposition.
Anyways, I think we both understand eachothers points so I’ll leave things here :P
2 Likes
I appreciate your dedication in collecting data. Do also have a list for Abrams? I mean the one you posted is cool, but i believe it serves no purpose without a counterpart
2 Likes
I’ve very recently gotten a new PC, so I no longer have all of those recordings, I’d have to start it over again to get a fair and objective picture.
3 Likes
havent seen that guy in a while
1 Like
The angle this round hit the Abrams its going into the Crew Compartment and then the its going into the engine. None of that shrapnel is going to hit the crew basket it might hit the commander and loader. You aren’t posting direct shots from other MBTs that show the Abrams being hit like T series tanks. You know what happens. You think I can’t see the sparks showing the impact angle? Are you a narcissistic liar? The round is impacting on the 4th composite panel going into the engine.
who?
M735. come ON Mr. Narcissist. Explain this bug report, its has been 2 years. Gaijin has not fixed this yet.
Get a USB Flash Drive as long as your hard drive didn’t get wiped, the recording will still be there.
Im going through your comments, and you really are a narcissistic liar.
THe 2A5 is better tha nthe New russian tank with APS? Its better than all the challengers?
Just stop there is no way you believe this.
Im not the only person noticing your hate boner for the Abrams.
Am i also zannfrancy12?
I can’t tell if you’re actually a liar, or just dumb.
You’re blocked on that account as well, no need to reply further.
So you are a narcist. I see I called you out on your hatred of the Abrams and your first thing to do is block me.
REO look at necrons post history Look at how he talks about the Abrams. Note how he’s lying to other people and is going to continue to lie.
I’m not following, not sure what’s going on anymore. It seems like you guys have a history, and i’m not caught up on the lore
This necrons guy hates the Abrams, look at his account post history. Not only that he is posting videos and pictures showing the Abrams getting hit in the engine and saying that the round hitting the Abrams is tantamount of the Abrams survivability. You can easily tell from the picture that he himself posted, the impact angle of the round hit the Abrams then went into the engine.
This necrons go is either blind or thinks we’re stupid
This impact he is showing is hitting the Fourth Composite Skirt of the Abrams at a oblique angle. You can go into the game count back from the rear of the Abrams use the hit simulator and you will see that the round goes into the engine, and would never kill the entire crew if it would even hit the crew at all. I deal with people like Necrons on a daily basis. They hate people that critically analyze situations.
TL:DR
He’s passing off a engine round as a crew hit, when it isn’t. and is hoping no one notices it.
This necrons guy is on every single post about the Abrams. Im starting to think this guy is an Iraqi survivor of Desert Storm and has a phobia of the Abrams.
All - Activity - Necrons31467 - War Thunder — official forum
im not making any thing up Is it too much to ask to fix US Ground top tier? - #728 by PompousMagnus
Everyone that says something about the Abrams he is saying something against them.
Lol only M1A1 has 5 KD, keep up the big talk
You see what im saying? Necrons is a Liar.