read the flight performance part of the link above.
1 Like
The flight performance might be marginally better but the missile load definitely isn’t.
2 Likes
yes fortunatly you r right.
but look no python 4s but python 3s with aim 9ms is kinda good
In the current radar missile meta it’s not great
1 Like
I’m pretty sure Lavi never had 9M, as Israel received them only somewhere during the 2000’s
I read the link you quote, It seems that it can only carry 4*Python 3 as air battle loadout, am I right?
it had python 3s and aim 9M/Ls
for some reason i cant find the site i read that in. i will sand it as soon as i find it.
I cant find the site i found it in, ill send it as soon as i find it.
Better than the J-10? Really? I thought the J-10 had superior flight performance while the big advantage was the 30mm with better velocity than the 23mm found on the J-10.
1 Like
A website isn’t a source. Just a friendly reminder.
The Lavi was intended to carry Derbys and Python 4s, while the radar was compatible with the Aim-7 and the Aim-9M and Python 3 were also mounted.
If gaijin wants to go down the Yak-141 route, they can give the Lavi countermeasures and more, allowing it to have access to ARH, HMD, and Python 4s if we’re lucky. Well just have to see… hopefully gaijin doesn’t apply double standards and give the Lavi poor treatment compared to the Yak-141.
I did some searching on internet, can I consider python 4 has a similar maneuverability capability as r73?
1 Like
Python 3 and 9L, yes, but not 9M, as they only entered service in Israel in 2008 (iirc) on their F-16’s only. I even think that the F-15’s ingame didn’t even have 9M and just have it for balance reasons, but I’m not sure about that one.
1 Like
No.
What a kind individual!
2 Likes
Yes. (JK)