lmao
Well he’s right on the fact that India and Israel are very close military partners, and India relied (and still relies) heavily on Israeli tech for their military: weapons, avionics… So it doesn’t seem too weird to me.
But eh I have accepted the fate of India being in Britain
1 Like
India was one of the first countries to recognize Israel as a state, and for decades now, India has been working alongside Israel militarily. The only connection India has to Britain is the British Raj.
If you are unfamiliar with these relations, I highly suggest you research them. Israel and India do many Military exercises together.
If Israel doesn’t get the Indian Su-30, I’d rather it go to Russia like the Iranian F-14. Britain should not have it.
1 Like
i guess we could make the same argument with russia tbh
1 Like
exactly.
Then give to Russia. I don’t care as long as Israel or Russia gets it. Britain should not have an Su-30.
1 Like
Britain should get it because they have India lol.
It’s like when Chinese mains get mad vt4 is gonna be added to Thailand, it’s a subtree so just gotta deal with it
1 Like
Britain shouldn’t have kept India past their independence. There’s a reason why everyone hated the Brishma being in Britain.
2 Likes
im not personally against britain getting the indian MKI since gaijin has stated the uk tree is gonna be more of the commenwealth tree aswell in the future. and its a good way to get some more life out of a minor nations tech tree
1 Like
i didn 't hate the T-90S
Modern India isn’t a part of the Commonwealth. It’s outrageous to have India, which doesn’t care for Britain much, in the British tech tree when better historical options exist.
1 Like
My only issue with the Indian sub tree is that they have add nothing for it really
India cannot add anything to Britain, but can do wonders for Israel’s gaps. It’s not only historically accurate, but significantly healthier.
1 Like
i think they should have just added the vehicles to their respective (partnered/co developed) nations eg su30mki to russia , rafale to france etc.
it could add to Britain and any nation could add to Israel as there is nothing there
The Indian Su-30 was codeveloped with Israel in ways as well, hence why it can use Israeli weapons and why I’d prefer it going to Russia or Israel. As Russia does not need another Su-30 with Israeli ordinance, I suggested, for the historical precedent and health of the game, that it should go to Israel.
If Israel got the Indian Su-30, it would cause significantly less drama than if Britain received it and be healthier for the game.
They didn’t codeveloped it with Israel
Using Israeli HMD doesn’t make it codeveloped
Russia doesn’t need mki anyways due to them having su30sm. But Israel getting it is dumb because India is already a sub tree of Britain and not Israel therefore all Indian vehicles should go to Britain
2 Likes
It’s heavily compatible with Israeli systems. It uses many of them as well. Considering Israel and India’s regularly military cooperation, how do you come to this conclusion?
You’re contradicting yourself. If it uses Israeli systems, it was codeveloped to have them.
majority of the components are russian tho ? airframe - russian , radar (N011m) russian , air to air missiles (mostly russian) r73, r77 , r77-1.