Sir, I know your pain because I am an Attack aircraft enjoyer in ARB.
I pre-ordered Tornado IDS WTD61 even though I had Tornado IDS MFG and GR.1
and working on ASTTA1 and (1995)
But can you just chill down and be polite a bit?
Yeah. we have some other examples like MiG-27 or Milan, or Mirage 5
Which was developed from fighters like MiG-23 and Mirage IIIE.
MiG-27 in ARB nowadays is just worse inferior MiG-23M (but with better amount of CM)
and Milan stuck at 9.7BR thanks to base bombing capability while superior J35A sent down to 9.3.
Also, Mirage 5 is nothing but sluggisher version of Mirage IIIC which traded R.530 SARH on center pylon for bombs.
If we get rid of the base bombing capability from ‘all of those jets classified as fighter’
some of these jets will be dead by collateral damage.
1 Like
Those that can carry radar-guided missiles are fighter jets,while attack aircraft have simple and basic self-defense infrared missiles.
2 Likes
No.
Reducing rewards is bad for games.
What anti-player nonsense suggestion.
The Russian Federation is great again!
I disagree, the game is already bad enough to bomb, it’s better to just create bigger bases so that several aircraft can bomb them at the same time and give credit according to the amount of tons thrown, even allowing bomber formations, unlike what happens today, where each plane flies in any direction, and for the love of god, go back to immersion, put allies vs axis, etc, this nonsense of having everyone against everyone is garbage.
At Tier 8 vehicles,no one would give up carrying radar-guided missiles just to bomb the combat zone!My suggestion is only suitable for players in the Tier 6-7 group.
I would, if it means more rewards. But also I don’t really use radar missiles
Your suggestion is good.Increase the size of the combat zones and refine the facilities within them,such as power plants,armories,and nuclear facilities.Bombarding these targets to gain revenue!
1 Like
Me, looking at my Su-34 load-out I used for grind
Mig-27’s were originally added into the game as Strike fighters, but people abused their air spawn ability to rush the enemy fighters that barely managed to take-off from the airfield.
Gaijin just took the lazy approach to fix the issue and changed the classification to Fighter to remove the airspawn and forgot to change it back when the airspawn was removed from all rank VI+ planes.
Well,so I suggest increasing the revenue for attack aircraft and bombers when bombing combat zones,or reducing the revenue for fighter jets bombing zones,to ensure a better experience for bombers and attack aircraft!
Shall I open another thread on this? Because 2 is not enough?
Maybe, or maybe not.
Do we need to call mod about shutting this down
and guide them to thread ‘which is already made’?
I’m sure nerfing rewards further is the way to go! (Awful idea, feel bad about having said awful idea, please)
:P
1 Like
Please use already existing topics about this
1 Like