They are still better than before, 36% to 51%
Is that legal?
Massive nerf inbound for sure
I guess turret baskets increased the survivability of M1s…
3 Likes
it works against tow (1’s) only opticals get spoofed by it
1 Like
It did not ingame, but WR certainly have ups and downs just like Russia did not get any nerfs to their ground tanks recently and they’re down, i bet a buff coming their way in the next few weeks to help them float.
I was just having a laugh at comically bad arguments how US had awful WRs because M1s are atrocious and they needed buffs.
1 Like
tbh their entire top tier win rate was carried by the SPAA+CAS combo they had, the rest of their top tier vehicles are average at best, ofc its gonna drop when you take away the one advantage they had
Because they do, honestly if every M1 get modeled right and their bugs get fixed they literally can be on par with the top three nations.
But right now its the opposite, after the basket nerf the WR went up which is obvious considering they move up and down sometimes just like Russian WR.
M1s are already top three tank models in the game.
Considering they moved up to 50%+ WR without any help, I doubt they need any more help, as at that point it would be handholding.
Imagine going up in WR after getting “hugely” nerfed with those baskets.
Another case of forumers over exaggerating stuff to suit their everlasting moaning.
2 Likes
2A7V, 2A7AU, 2A6NL, STV122B maybe the T90, then the Abrams.
So because US players are playing better, the Abrams should stay broken and being able to be shot through the turret ring by 3BR tanks? No, it’s not handholding, it’s fixing a tank that has been neglected and nerfed continually. Gaijin got the gunshield armor so wrong, the rest of the tank is just as badly modeled. It’d be funny seeing every other tank shot trapped in the same way the Abrams is. Badly placed shots between the hull and turret. General shots = turret ring dead, you don’t even have to aim. The community would loose their collective minds.
Le copium, maximum
1 Like
You mean uparmored Leopards, T-series and M1s ?
Just tried to show that vehicles on their own weren’t at fault for those 30-40% WRs.
You increasing the armor on the turret ring to 200-250mm still wouldn’t save you from 8.0 rounds, let alone top tier ones, so you’re over fixating and over exaggerating this issue.
I think you’re the only one that’s coping here.
M1s proved their worth and are more than capable vehicles at their BRs.
Just because US players are focused more on malding than actually learning how to play, doesn’t mean their tanks are bad in any way.
That said, M1 family receiving 5s reload was more than enough to keep them competitive and any more buffs might warrant a BR increase.
Not like vehicles like Click Bait and HC don’t already deserve to be at 12.0.
2 Likes
Surprised they haven’t reported your replies for pointing out the obvious. Like they did our earlier ones.
3 Likes
Don’t speak too soon.
Any reply that goes over the fact M1s aren’t worse than CR2s and are actually playable surely gets a lot of the attention from the report police.
Especially if you mention muh turret rings, probably the biggest nothing burger in the history of WT.
3 Likes
So advocate for fixing the Abrams and all it’s problems. Seems it wouldn’t bother you anyway.
lmfao? What are you even talking about? Gen 1 thermals
I’ve said numerous times already, I’d be fine with a slower reload in exchange for armor that actually works
1 Like
Can’t do that without a hefty BR increase, so no.
Having gen1 thermals doesn’t stop you from being at 12.0. Click Bait is a perfect contemporary of 2A5 for example.
Having that thing and HC below 2A5 is clear US favoritism. I also wonder how those two are below tanks like Ariete and CR2s as well.
Armor does work.
You thinking that armor works only when you’re completely immune to shells is your own problem.
2 Likes
Is there a reason that you didnt touch sep v2?
Was busy grinding other nations.
Funny, it doesn’t. The Abrams is the only MBT to have a shot trap. The lower mantlet is not modeled correctly, nor is the gunshield, and the thickness around the turret ring is wrong. You can argue all you want but you’re still advocating for keeping a bugged vehicle bugged. I find it funny and sad at the same time that you have nothing but “feelings” dictating your opinion.
3 Likes