Welp. I found my new model kit scheme.
Exactly. ALL former colonies and members of the commonwealth (besides America and Israel) should go to Britain.
2 Likes
Israel has 3 IFV’s with this same offensive layout…So whats the point in adding this to Israel, when Singapore is not a subtree of a single nation ? Could have gone to a nation that needs it.
Well. if you want to increase variety, than this does not increase variety at all.
5 Likes
Hell no
Britain should get it’s own vehicles, not a metric ton of vehicles imported by other nations
Technically, they’re all subjects of the crown which, by extension, makes them British subjects. So they aren’t imported, they’re our rightful vehicles.
1 Like
They’re imported.
Read
Read what?
Neither Britain nor the (former) Commonwealth members build Leopards, Hornets, F-15s, F-16s, etc
Those are imports, even if you consider the Commonwealth as part of Britain.
Because the turret is complete made by Rafael.
It’s almost like that country makes spikes, weird
Not a single connection to Japan with this vehicle. I’m sure there’s plenty of other options for it tho through it’s 3 subtrees. This vehicle is going to Israel tho, and as it should.
1 Like
The trade off for that is that it gets ahead rounds because the 30mm is mk44ABM that’s if gaijin decided to mount that exact gun on it bc it still has an option to Carry the same good ol shitmaster on the namers
Plus I think it has 200 rounds in the hull as reserve but I don’t have a source for that and not sure about it either
2 Likes
Israel is the best fit, the real question is:
Why is this being added in the first place?
They say it’s because Israel is lacking diversity when it comes to light support combat vehicles, yet this is extremely similar to the Namers lol
1 Like
Anything but an spaa for rank 7 and br range of 9.3-12.7
I honestly thought they would add the tor or even the HVSD/ADAMS but instead they added this thing
1 Like
Yeah if this gets AHEAD it will be a nice addition to Israel, the 3 IFVs they have dont have it and lacks that anti air capability so would be nice
Singapore to Israel, as an Israeli main, I’m so glad to get a new subtree!
Please do not tag CMs for questions that have already been answered.
The teaser is not dropping today and asking it directly won’t get you anywhere, I’m afraid you’ll have to wait.
1 Like
The entirety of Lynx is made by Rheinmetall, its however just in hungarian subtree and not hungary+germany. This is just common gaijin inconsistency and im tired of people defending it.
Literally means nothing. Spike is a very commonly used missile spread globally.
Its an ASEAN country, just like Malaysia, Thailand and Indonesia are all part of ASEAN organization. After that theres also vicinity that plays the role.
Singaporean vehicles function as fillers, not as dedicated subtrees. Literally stated multiple times. As such Japan has a massive gap in both light tanks and SPAAs.
This vehicle would have been a good functional filler for japan as they lack a higher light tank than 9.7 and even those vehicles are abysmal.
Israel has 3 spike bushmaster light tanks. This is like adding water into a full bucket.
They dont need another light tank that is worse than the already available options.
Theres Namer 30 which has skeletal turret with Merkava hull. Theres Namer Tsrikhon which has a turret with APS and Merkava hull and Eitan which is a more mobile wheeled option with once again, APS.
This thing is without APS and LWS, with same gun, same spike, worse armor and higher profile.
It is literally not needed as Israel already has 3 much better options at Rank 7 for the same role.
If Gaijin actually wanted to add variety like they wrote above, then like what others have suggested above; there is an Eitan 105mm that would have given them a 105 light tank that they dont have yet.
3 Likes
It’s not even a sub…
Watch them add the Cockerill 105 variant of the Hunter to France lol
Oh, and the SPYDER SR to Japan, just for the lolz
Let us have our moment, would you, other than that Columbian event vehicle and the copy paste Spitfire, we have nothing from a mother nation in our research tech tree.