11.3 like Namer 30
The MK.IV also has no air tracking, no anti air ammo, and is a manned turret all while being the weakest of the 10.7 spike slingers lol
11.0 would be fine for this thing
2 Likes
What I dont get is what variety does this provide?
This doesnt provide anything that doesnt already exist.
2 Likes
A light vehicle addition for Israel that would add variety would be better off as something like the Eitan prototype that has a 105mm on it, not yet another bushmaster+spike combo…
2 Likes
the Namer itself is not 11.3 material, this thing will be probably 11.0 - 10.7
But there is? It’s a tank the ROC operates and the China tech tree is shared by PRC and ROC
I hope no, come to japan
2 Likes
it has better armor than Namer 30 honestly
Why? Why does Japan deserve another Sub tree?
So it does. But, what the Hunter AFV will bring new to the table in terms of variety to the Israeli tech tree? I sincerly hope isn’t another Namer situation:
Which also considering the objective to add to the Israeli line-ups, could a similar vehicle be considered to Japan as well around this battle rating? Japanese line-up from battle rating 11.7 to battle rating 12.7 is pretty lacking and mostly rely on their main battle tanks Type 90 and variants, and Type 10 and variants respectively.
5 Likes
casue no
Taiwan is a subtree to China, i am saying you don’t need connections for a tank to be added in a TT even if it has stronger connections with other countries, because with this logic the M1A2T should have gone to USA because its an American system
I like how you guys say this while having 3 vehicles that are basically the same has the HUNTER at the same BR (11.3) while Japan doesnt have a 10.0+ IFV. At least make it make sense
Because japan still lack everything, the Israel doesn’t need Indonesia and def doesn’t deserve Greece
I think the issue here was that japan didn’t really have any connection (to the devs at least?)at all to singapore, let alone the hunter
I still think that Indonesia is a better choice for japan
1 Like
i mean Japan already has 3 subtrees, but it needs more this tank than Israel
I will agree it would be nice to have for a nation different from israel
1 Like
Also would like to just point out that this was only made because of the leak last year showing Gaijin’s original plan to put Singapore in China’s tree, which caused the outrage over it as it meant China not only getting the Abrams at some point due to Taiwan but also Leopards from Singapore on top of the VT-4 and ZTZ-99A.
Had Singapore just been a Japanese subtree this more than likely wouldn’t have had such a change in decision, in fact the Leopard might have been a bit welcome considering it’d give Japan something with armor since the Type 10’s armor is still massively underperforming, the T-84’s armor is outright horrid, and the VT-4 still hasn’t been added. But instead in the time since Japan got Malaysia and Indonesia, both of which were the far worse options.
bruh, Japan’s already got Leopard 2RI, they won’t give same thing in a tech tree nation