Hello, is this a Rank VII or Rank VI vehicle?
Rank VII (Considering other bushmaster with spike missile are at rank VII)
Spikes which means 10.7 at a minimum, so another vehicle rendered useless because you refuse to fix the bmpt.
Joy.
1 Like
It’s free
VII, there was a typo in the blog.
Already fixed, thanks.
5 Likes
Not a single competent ATGM light tank in there. Best we can get is 105 on wheels and track. And as of NOW not a single light tank provided by thailand is good enough past their BR of 9.0 and 9.3 iirc for stingray.
Japans only higher BR light tank is a pure bushmaster Type 24 and 25, both of which are mediocre at best.
1 Like
also if it gets added what br will it be, 10.7? who will play it then?? it has no line-up to go with
Whatever BR is Puma VTJ and Namer
That my thought, the last 3 vehicles they added for isreal have been bushmaster spike light tanks lol, all of which are considered light tanks. Could have given them an actually useful light tank perhaps?
As far as Im aware those 3 nations can’t provide something thats comparable to this. This vehicle doesnt provide anything over the Namer, Namer Tshrikon, or Eitan (P)
It most definitely wont have better mobility than the Eitan, it wont have the armor of the Namers, and it doesnt have APS.
There is nothing about this vehicle that isnt fulfilled by something else.
Israel need SPAA not another bushmaster
? we have 3 11,3 light tanks
it would be better in Japan
1 Like
the Namer is 11.3 (for some reason) and the Puma is 11.0 while the Cv90 with 6 spikes is at 10.7
1 Like
There are so many more interesting additions for Israel as well to receive, hell Pereh alone would probably make me grind out the entire Israel tree.
Instead its another spike light tank for a nation that has 3 of them already. Supposedly addition based on need of the nation, im sure israel needed another rank 7 spike bushmaster light tank
Because Namer Tsrikhon, Namer 30 and Eitan are not enough.
1 Like
they dont have armor, they haven’t model them correctly
Like, tell me Im not going crazy here but the reasons listed for adding this to Israel actually seem like the reasons to NOT add it to Israel.
4 Likes
So maybe 11.0
4 Likes
the CV-90 mk.IV is at 10.7 this thing looks like it and it doesn’t seem very good and i bet if you fire at the turret all the ammo will be gone
Doesn’t mean it belongs to Japan. There is no relation between the Singaporean Hunter and Japan.
Sure, Japan needs an IFV similar to this, but you are misreading the devblog. Taking into account characteristics and needs of both the vehicle and the nations, which can be technical or gameplay related.
The Hunter has Israeli modules and the devs believe that Israel has lacking variety with the current vehicles. I’m disengaging from this conversation now before it spirals.
We’ll be looking to place Singaporean vehicles in a number of trees, most likely with their vehicles going to whatever tree is most applicable and relevant on a case by case basis and best suits each specific vehicle.
1 Like
Yea, now that i think about it, it might be 10.7