By most sources you mean 1 source.
1 Like
1 source and shit they pulled out of their own ass apparently
4 Likes
They did the same thing with the stinger/mistral G-pull too
4 Likes
Britain is in hell
Forum moderators really under damage control after this article lol
17 Likes
I’m assuming Britain is already dust XD
Doesn’t matter how many people they censor. The outrage will not be quelled.
3 Likes
Never o7
1 Like
Watch them consider this not a primary source, and then add gen 7 thermals to every T series because some russian general sneezed on a napkin and it kinda looked like a tank
17 Likes
Well, you see you need to have a sign document from Joe Biden himself and 60-page document breaking down every inch of the composite to the exact measurement, where it came from, how it was transported, etc. Then maybe it would be good enough for the devs.
14 Likes
I mean yeah, I’m not saying they’re correct at all, necessarily, but hypothetically if you DID improve the armor to take a lot more hits before falling apart, Congress probably WOULD be pretty happy with that.
Funny how we never have conversation of underperforming armor of russian tanks, and for abrams it’s the third battle with gaijin. First was when they added IP and M1A1. Second with M1A2 and now third. Spall liners for Abrams, Leclerc, and Merkavas will also be ignored because reason. I hope french players have their government financial spending report on spall liners for leclerc like we have for DU armor, otherwise there will be no discussion about this. This is outrageous.
5 Likes
We literally commented in the article on some of the sources players provided.
Why “Some”? Why not “All”? You left out literally like 2 dozen other sources people gave.
The only plausible reason to not have replied to all is that you couldn’t manage to come up with a counterargument to the others…
(“Not having the time, due to low importance” is a reason I frankly don’t consider “plausible” for you to believe here, in the face of your players almost rioting again over this. So that just leaves “We couldn’t come up with a reason to deny the other sources”)
5 Likes
This specifically says that the DU upgrade was for the M1A1SA, not the SEP… LOL
I’m sure if some rando said that the T-14 had a prototype equipped with a 190mm particle beam laser cannon able to turn a tank into molten sludge within microseconds of exposure and the guys only source was his sleep paralysis demon who told him in a dream, it would be in the game in a heartbeat.
3 Likes
…that the SA upgrade was a recipient of the SEP program improvements. It is literally making the M1A1s have the improvements of the SEP. LOL!
Also notice the suspension upgrades that Gaijin claimed never happened.
20 Likes
M1a1SA has the same armor package as SEP just so you know.
6 Likes
Username checks out.
5 Likes
damn the fact they specifically mention he M1A1 and the 70 ton weight with improvements flat out debunks gaijins suspension claims here
7 Likes
Wait so 2-3 examples of T80bs receiving experimental thermals is enough to justify it having thermals in the tech tree but “muh 5 Du hulls” doesn’t get the same justification? Interesting….
Side note - Yes I know the 5 DU hulls is outdated and further amendments clarify more than 5, just a funny contradiction in “Gaijin policy”
33 Likes