The armour of the Swedish tanks is pretty much nothing compared to the Russian tanks, at the moment the current gameplay favours the Chinese and Russian armour the most!
1 Like
This is topic on M1 Abrams, please focus on it.
Thanks!
There is already ongoing topic on other vehicles here:
5 Likes
After giving you all the reasons why they will not add the uranium armor to the chassis, showing you the sources that they have access to, and still citing the sources that the players say and giving reasons to each of them, AND YOU STILL say that you have a problem…
13 Likes
Any answers for the additional sources for the L2A7V given in that thread would be appreciated, the only source cited in that post is to old to be reliable and is referencing a different tank (Leopard 2 improved). That document was written before the 2A7V was even designed.
6 Likes
Could we get answers for all the other sources given as well?
Like the ones removing the limit of DU for those 5 hulls.
Or the publications stating DU in the hull?
14 Likes
While I agree with your sentiment, there are even more sources they have yet to answer to.
They even talk about the limit of 5 hulls but no comment on the removal of that limit for future installs.
5 Likes
This is not a thread about Abrams its about how purposely denying Abrams armor increase with lame excuses, after the mess you caused on yesterday im surprised you guys have nerve to publish this thread.
İts clear that Devs are purposely Gaslighting their community base, this Abrams hull armor and Leopard2A7V armor situation is nothing but a mess.
48 Likes
Where’s its spall liners
15 Likes
Naturally the US never upgraded the hull armor of its workhorse vehicle for the past 40 years, of course.
63 Likes
Only russian vehicles allowed to have experimental features(thermal) of limited(1-2 tanks) series
NATO vehicles cannot
Continue to showing your true face to players, and the best idea for roadmap would be deleting the game
64 Likes
To be honest with you, I don’t really care about their sources, just like they don’t care about the sources that the players bring up! The top tier is unplayable because of their bias!
14 Likes
The whole point of the SEP program was to increase survivability while maintaining weight…and Gaijin used weight as a reason the armor cannot possibly be better
99 Likes
We literally commented in the article on some of the sources players provided.
6 Likes
Congressional Boss: What changes did you make to the M1A2 with all this money?
Gajin Employee: We’ve improved the front armor of the hull to improve the armor’s impact resistance.
9 Likes
But you didn’t answer to all of them?
Some of them literally countering your earlier statements.
19 Likes
…and the turret, for 31 years.
Because even SEPv2 has A2 values ingame in spite of it being a brand new gen of armor.
Oh, and also; not even M1A2 has actual M1A2 values, but those of the Swedish trials export variant which didn’t have DU, but an armor that offered ”similar protection”, except it was on the lower end and it didn’t satisfy the Swedes.
In short; M1A2 SEPv2, the workhorse of the U.S army by 2023, has the armor of an early 1990s export trials variant.
Also- doesn’t SEPv2 weight 64 tons without TUSK? For what reason could it possibly be?
34 Likes
I think you have to put the article in at least 5 languages so they can understand it…
2 Likes
This is English speaking section.
Article translations will also be provided for other languages, as soon as translation will be ready.
4 Likes
Then can you explain how did M1 Abrams weight increased significantly over the years without enchancing its main armor, are you gonna tell me all those extra weights coming from electronics?
This explanation is so lame that even 5 years old kid can see the lies beneath this.
38 Likes
Why do I get the feeling that the “some” are the ones you can deny? lol
22 Likes