technically it could be mounted on the F-4J since it was tested on the model, that was, however, before their HMCS was applied as a modification ( I could be wrong, someone correct me if i am).
That’d make it pretty strong-ish and could bring it to relevance as a semi-upgrade over the F-4S actually))
I think the top f-4 and the f-14 should get it to bring them up to speed but if not then the f-16 (apparently tested) could get it as a counter to the migs r-73
I suppose we could get that one F-14A that carried 120s as an event vehicle and give it Agiles too
At minimum, the F-14 and F-15 used VTAS during the testing for these missiles. I believe the A-7 did as well, but i can’t remember where ive seen it
Yup, both of those tested with VTAS during AIMVAL, the same event that the Agile was tested at.
I can’t find anything about the A-7, though, other than that the theoretical A-7F Corsair III would’ve used it.
Then its settled.
Gaijin gib!!!
One of the HMS’s mentioned in the F-16 HMS study document references that one of them is certified on the A-7E, which obviously also took part in AIMVAL.
Also considering how much of the F-16C/D Electronics the A-7D & -K ended up late in ANG service with, it wouldn’t have been that hard to do something similar for them.
To this day, it blows my mind the americans had the AIM-95 agile and the VTAS HMS’s in thr 70’s, and just dropped their developement, then panicked hard in the 1990’s when they realized the russians had HMS’s and R-73s…
The US has a nasty habit of underestimating everyone else and then ending up on the backfoot technologically.