As for now, I think tiny changes in BR can help some vehicles out.
1 Like
I just don’t think Leopard needs that help though.
But I guess this is a thread about HSTV-L, so talking about Leopard isn’t ideal lol.
Leopard is decent at 8.0 but it’s not that great to be honest.
Just look at the Vickers Mk.1, or the OF-40 (which is basically a slightly less mobile Leopard I but with a LRF), or the Type 69 (much slower but has good armour against conventional rounds, has a LRF and has a Stab), or the TO-55 (better mobility than the Type 69 but no LRF), or the Magach 5 (which gets ERA and even 105mm DM23, though it has similar mobility to the Type 69 and no stab).
Yeah lol.
1 Like
Absolutely - with fixed mobility and gun handling
1 Like
Looks like the Turret basket being modeled as part of the traverse mechanism is not a bug
Time to report the T-XX series not having it modeled. Russian Bias doesn’t exist right?
2 Likes
would changing the name to 75mm ADMAG(ARES) prevent from hstvl and rdflt from using delta 6? Cuz im pretty sure gaijin change the name for a reason
They changed the name because of the bug report. And yes it does prevent delta 6.
i will not be researching the hstvl then
If that’s what you want to do. The HSTV-L’s ammo still underperforming and can receive delta 3.
how much worse delta 3 compare to delta 6
delta 6 is m774 performance so what can delta 3 be?
gawd daym it’s tiny
Delta 3 is M774. Delta 6 could pen 430mm.
REAL???
Well it’s not M774 but it is the round they say say should have the preformance of M774.
i get it but REALLY? So if hstvl/rdflt have that it would still be good
huh nice
time to DTIC
If Gaijin ever adds it yea.
god only knows
Would this mean another varient for the hstvl could come that could use delta 6? maybe the lav version?
When 14.0 ground then maybe