HQ11 lacks the accompanying 1130 close-in defense system

yes i agree with this fully, but we dont expect such fairness anymore.

but that wasnt the issue…

speaking of which, it is basically an SLM but with a 30mm AHEAD firing gatling cannon. i dont see why the CIWS of the HQ11 would be so out of the question. ← keeping in mind i desire ALL nations to recieve CIWS or DL SPAAGs to their TADS systems

1 Like

you keep saying this like the ciws isn’t actually part of the hq-11 system

the hq-11 system is both missile and gun

it is not just the telar

edit: if they wanted the avoid this double standard they could’ve added any one of the dozen other available chinese spaa options

3 Likes