Curious, as I have an article that’s been under final review for about 3 weeks now.
Depending on the demand, as I believe the Wiki moderator staff count is very low and I’m assuming that a good amount of people wants to publish articles for the goldies—they have to review the text if it falls under the rules of article publishing. An article can take from two weeks up to a month to be fully reviewed and published.
That’s understandable, maybe they should consider getting more staff if they’re struggling. A lot of the trusted authors that do the first stage of page reviews would do amazing.
That’s what I’m hoping. Since the opening of the Wiki 3.0 the time wasted on waiting to review articles has always been a issue and with this thread poking the same subject again is just more obvious that’s what the frustating part of writing an article in the first place in my opinion.
Maybe we should bring it up with the senior wiki staff and see what they think.