iirc. 11.3. But that is largely irrelevant as we havent got a single 11.3 ground vehicle. So the lowest it will operate is 11.7. Which places it at the same BR as the Tornado Gr1 (which is better is down to personal prefernece) and would be 0.3 lower than the Gr7 which has 100% identical A2G loadout, but 9Ms and 2x more BOL
Might be pretty good in GRB due to the AGM-65G’s. 11.7 has a pretty good matchmaker rn so you won’t get curbstomped by a Pantsir too often.
Yeah, Gr7 was fairly good for low level hit and run attacks, having the T.10 for the 11.7 line-up (which can sometimes be quite good for netting downtiers) might be quite fun.
Though both the T.10 and Gr7 should actually have 6x AGM-65s but are limited to only 4 at the moment and TIALD should be Gen 2 not Gen 1
You got any evidence for this?
Also, Russian helicopters have a wickedly high heat signature as well, I had to do some testing with a buddy after I was unable to kill an unaware Mi-28A (the Swedish one), after 4 Fim-92Es missed. He was standing still and dodging them magically.
Meanwhile in my own testing, the KA-52, 50, Mi-28Nm, N, 35, 24, 8, all couldn’t stop a stinger.
There was 1 outlier of the KA-52 blocking a single stinger, and notes the fact these all had ircm, the exhaust vent, and cms going off to defeat the stinger.
But the total cm count if far above that of other aircraft.
Read the bug reports yourself
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/B8OvCzjZ7E91
On paper only
Oh so it’s bs that your precious T.10 got more cms then? Great… gaijin going back to the paper tanks I see.
I think he means 320BOL is not the same as say 320Standard CM’s, Per single flare standard calibre you would need to drop 2 pairs of BOL for 4 total, to match a single standard flare in luminosity and duration.
Harrier T.10 having BOL isn’t up for debate;
3 Likes
So what does the Su-39 have? Or a Su25T, or Su25? They’re all listed as small cms.
Well if “Harrier T.10 having BOL isn’t up for debate” I raise you this:
R-77s, and R-27s, along with the ability to to carry either R-60s or R-73s…
There’s all sorts of other things the Su-39 is missing, but I’m just brushing the surface.
All countermeasures that aren’t listed as BOL or Large are standard.
And what is the “standard” effectiveness, as usually it take 4-8 flares to get 1 Aim-9L to miss.
i JUST watched an afterburing F/A-18 1 flare an aim9l from a rear aspect shot.
4 Likes
Yet the Harrier can not lol
1 Like
What even is your argument?
salt the T.10 gets to be usable? and its VERY good right now. the new RWR sound is very funny too (the “new target on rwr” indicator" ) and the maw. pretty fun
1 Like
I’ve seen it once lol.
Glad its fun though
I just really need the Shars HUD fixed
I’ve not even seen another person playing it lol! I’m waiting to re-create the 3 in formation (unfortunately we dont have a grey + 20SQN camo, just the green one)
already had a dogfight with an F5E and MiG23, and caused a maneuver kill on an F/A-18A. The harrier II buffs are decent enough, not too noticeable in actual gameplay. The MAW is very helpful at this BR and with the BOL is usable too! first time ive not turned it off for an aircraft
1 Like
Yeah the Harrier 2 already outclassed many planes in a dogfight. Now its got double the thrust lol.
The Sea Harrier now doesn’t even have issues against the F-5
Should I revisit AV-8C?
Yes, at 9.7 you are pretty dominant.
1 Like