i mean… it could be like an upgrade that they could do.
but hadnt done yet?
the barrel end is different though, instead of a reversed cone
this one is just a cylindrical end
plus the cut outs are waay different
1 Like
I would say its perspective here
Yea, WT is sh** for doing that
the cut outs are mismodelled?
ZA-35 did not had the cutouts. DPG has them
1 Like
For Germany:
LO 1800 FASTA 4M, with the 9K32M Strela-2M
UAZ-469 FASTA-4M, also with the 9K32M Strela-2M
9K31 Strela-1
9K35 Strela-10
2 Likes
Just muzzle breaks, this is what the programming device actually looks like:
4 Likes
I stand corrected then.
1 Like
New Prototype SPAA for the US just dropped.
C-UAS-DE
2 Likes
also a west german equivalent:
some Mercedes chassis with Stinger pods
5 Likes
Looking at this, I feel Gaijin would just make a single vehicle but have the option to switch between using stingers and strelas
1 Like
Why is there no Pantsir-SM
Haven’t got around to adding it and on-top of that there is already 3 other Pantsir variants for Russia.
But I can add it my next batch of updates.
2 Likes
Although the chassis is different i can see gaijin making that mistake
I wouldn’t call it a mistake, but rather a “creative decision”.
2 Likes
That’s an awfully appropriate term to describe some of Gaijin’s decision they’ve made on some aspects of the game.
I mean it would be the smarter thing to do instead of adding two of (basically) the same vehicle but with different set of missiles. I would be annoyed at grinding that.
It does seem like Gaijin would rather add the same vehicles with different armament rather then add armament to old vehicle.
Dynamic BRs might help with something like that.
True, i was just thinking of what would be better for the player. (Basically the opposite of what Gaijin would do)