your statements that said you think that spaa cannot deal with top tier CAS because they 100% can if used correctly. You would know this if you were a good player and not a low br padder.
So You can’t really answear what have been said, great.
Stats just debunk what You are saying, it is not a matter of what I think.
" According to our data, the balance at the top ranks of ground battles is noticeably shifted towards aviation and helicopters, and this balance has become even worse with the introduction of top aircraft this year. The situation where aircraft can attack tanks from a safe distance with impunity makes gameplay more boring for aviation and less fair for ground vehicles, a similar situation is with helicopters equipped with long-range fast ATGMs, or “fire-and-forget” ATGMs."
So is a UH-1B a problem? No. Why? The Spaa is far better than the helicopter.
Is the Mi-28N a problem? No. Why? The spaa is far better than the helicopter.
Is the Mi-28A a problem? yes. Why? It’s slightly better than the spaa at the same br (also has some premium Sweden bias).
Is the KA-52 a problem? Yes/ no. Why? It doesn’t put range any spaa, and usually is taken down by planes / spaa relatively easily. But like other CAS, left unchecked by CAP or spaa, it’s able to do damage.
Is the Tiger UHT, Israel Black Hawk, and others with FnF a problem? Yes. Because they can launch many atgm and hide, and be fine.
Are the top tier planes a problem? Yes. Long range capability across all nations that can annihilate. Ground units. KH-38s, brimstones, AGM-65s, AAMs, etc.
Thankfully the sp cost is getting higher, meaning less CAS
Are lower tier planes a problem? Absolutely. The revenge CAS is immense. Add in the fact, it’s not ever just 1-2 planes, it’s usually 3-6
You just contradicted yourself… the Mi-28a is op because it’s a lower br, and has the same ATGMs as the Mi-28N, which is a higher br, with the only true difference being a thermal.
Any 11.0 or 10.7 spaa should be able to decimate either. But the problem is the mi-28a is 10.7, which can see 9.7, in 9.7, it’s king. So Sweden bias I guess?
Also be careful with your “can” statements. Remember, 1 4000kg bomb CAN kill up to 30 tanks
“Of course it is not”
basic English would dictate if I said:
(Which means) You agree.
You may have more ATGMs, but a semi skilled spaa player will just nuke you. Mi-28N being 11.0 is far more likely to see spaa that will out class it in every manner.
It’s only “hopeful” brs are 10.3-10.0 which will only be seen about 20% of the time.
Because you’ll have equal range at those brs, and more ATGMs.
The MI-28A can both see 9.7 and has the same capabilities as the Mi-28N
I know that You want to debate much but can we really stop with this derail of the topic?
Not really as again I still have much more rockets to shoot at him and can use terrain to my advantage.
Not if we take into consideration of how game works as in enemy team there can be only 16 enemy players at the same time. If we want to talk about our imagination then we should switch the forum.
That is why Yak-9UT will always be more effective than one big bomb ;)
Moreover, there is a player on YouTube who plays better than 99.999% of the players on this forum, but for some reason he complains about aviation on almost every stream) Are you sure that only bad players complain about aviation?