Yeah. im purely looking at this from an ARB/ASB perspective.
As for GRB. I wonder if we can get AGM-65Ds instead of AGM-65Bs on the grounds that the A-10A Late can run 4x 9Ls + 6x 65Ds + a better gun and 8x the CM count at the same BR (I think there is evidence of the H200 running AGM-65Gs as well)
slower, worse accel. better instant turn but burns energy far worse. only benefit is dropping one flare instead of two per CM firing
and that is wrong for the Shar. I beleive there is a report in for that
harriers have a lot of reports from our favourite document leaker but dont expect them to beome the VTOL hunters they should be
Yeah, nor do I.
Half the reports I think they are ignoring so that it doesnt change the balance they think they have
I’ve not tried it yet, but maybe I could live with this. I need my aircraft to do somewhat instant turns when needed or else it drives me mad
you have one instant turn and then youre at like 300mph and very very dead
Forgive me if I’m being tiresome, but the Sea Harrier Frs.1 broke me. (Being someone who came from AV-8B plus) I’ll take anything at this point
I think thats the image Ive seen. So probably a Gaijin judgement call at the moment then
i love harriers but they are just horrid to play from their VTOL not really working, their AOA is still lacking a little and their energy retention is still landing gear deep in the gutter.
every harrier ought to be lower than they currently are. Im really hoping the hawks dont have the same fate
it will be to hold its CAS abilities back. do wish it had the D but its a big enough miracle that its finally being added
I love the Harrier II, though I’ve only tried the one in US/Italy and I’m still grinding towards the British ones. They feel like totally different aircraft, as you can actually turn with fighters. (And pull hilarious stunts with vectoring)
Shameless plug: https://youtu.be/TJuOq__t__c?si=E3OD-VEAbw31xu6H
Sooo yeah that’s why going to Harrier I was quite a shock for me. I’ve gotten used to it now but that doesn’t make it good
yea they are very good. Its a shame most the harrier iis are premiums with very aggressively limited ammunition to put them at 11.3.
FYI the thrust vectoring should be a hell of a lot more violent but the game doesnt model that at all
This would be so much fun to get properly modeled.
guy on your tail?
full vector and they overshoot instantly to eat a 9M before they even know wtf happenned. just like when you combine thrust reverse and airbrake on the tonka
I think this is a B, or at least one of the TV versions:
Yes, scene mag means it’s an AGM-65B.
Another way to tell if it’s TV/CCD or IIR is if there is a rotation band, which connects the seekerhead to the rest of the body. It’s only present on the IIR versions. But in the above picture it kinda cuts the Maverick right before being able to properly see it.
Grey inert AGM-65D showing rotation band (and up arrow):
I’ve tried finding alternate angles but had no luck unfortunately.
