Given Yammy and Musashi, Roma and Italia aren’t and how painfully thin Germany top tier is, I hope not.
Fair (did H and J have any other planned refits? I have a feeling Gajin would probably go there for premiums if the opportunity presents itself).
mr snail am waiting for this
would be awesome to bully mr H-39 with 500mm gun 😸

510mm, actually.
Given they only were laid down, probably not.
I’m hoping we get this more so that having a unique part allows ships to be added
(Ersatz Monarch would be cool)
So you’re basing a finished ship on a keel that was partially laid, and blueprints. Everyone knows that prints are a guide when constructing because changes can and do occur during construction. Things get added and taken away according to budget and needs during the construction process, so there is NO way to know what the final result would’'ve been.
Funny how you can do this in naval, but remove vehicles in land/air that may have not been completed, mock-ups, or blueprint. It’s just more argument for adding removed vehicles back in.
It’s inconsistent policy and should apply to all or nothing.


According to archives SU implemented new technological method for producing plates 370-420mm in 1940, with new mark of steel and completed about 4500t fully conditional plates(that about 75-80 piececs) to the June on 1941, with the start of the war they were used for the pillboxes in Defence of Leningrad.
Wake up to see new post
Sees boat I’ll go back to sleep
This is how I feel about plane posts
Dont bother communicating with him, he will argue black is white if its Russian/Soviet or American equipment.
Has anyone bug reported the hight of the 300mm section of H-39s Belt armour being too low on the Dev server yet?
They’ve been treating naval additions like this for a long time
Being laid down is the minimum for a ship, so H-39 meets that requirement
I find it hilarious this thing is seen as a potentially way to fight back against the Soyuz. Realistic scenario against the Soviet fantasy is single round hits H-39, H-39 detonates(know this from experience since I’ve seen the Soyuz 1 tap yamatos).
The keel was never completed so it doesn’t count.
You keep claiming other people are biased while showing your obvious bias. Very hypocritical position.
Still laid down
No, it wasn’t. It was partially laid…and the keel is ONE lateral beam that runs the length of the ship that the structure is built around. That’s like laying down two treads of a tank and saying, “It counts”. I get it, gaijin can bend/ignore any rules they want, but it isn’t right.

That ONE beam down the center is the keel, and It was NOT completed. That is NOT enough to base an entire ship on.
The build time for a german battleship was near 3 years in WW2…and a LOT can change on a completed project in that time. Finishing that ship is PURE speculation, nothing more.
Laid down =/= keel completed
Yeah, base an entire ship on ONE beam that was not done. You can’t see how stupid that logic is? You have no argument so I’m just gonna put u on ignore fanboy.
It’s not my logic, it’s Gaijin’s logic.
Laid down is Laid down, doesn’t matter if that concerns a hull being 90% complete or 0.01% complete.
