All I can find is a study on how it could be installed on an F-14A, not that it was ever done. And that was two decades before the F-14D entered service.
Unless you have some other source?
1 Like
Nothing hard-proving on hand. I’ve never got much into VTAS development, I just know it was successfully tested on F-15 and F-14 during ACEVAL/AIMVAL. From quick search:
5 Likes
Interesting, still, it wouldn’t be enough for Gaijin. At best the HMS could be reported for the F-14A but there would need to be some better sources.
The F-14A and D are very different beasts and don’t really share a whole lot in common besides the basic airframe.
Not denying that but I still hope it happens. At this point AIM-120 is what really matters for us and VTAS II would only be an extra edge for the jet.
2 Likes
you forgot the jolly rogers skin!
1 Like
I don’t think the Jolly Rogers squadron had historically operated the F-14D or F-14D(R) last time I checked. No Jolly Rogers skin, unfortunately. Most likely, someone would make a semi-historical skin of it for the F-14D via loot boxes.
1 Like
they flew A’s And B’s my bad
3 Likes
can actually take 8 amraams as the underwing pylons could be turned into dual racks for 120s
7 Likes
no evidence for that besides a single photo afaik
Updated & reorganized F-14D specs; added supplemental data and diagrams of the F-14D SAC. I am hesitant to include NAVAIR 01−F14AAD−1 in specs and sources since it is technically still restricted to the public outside the US unless stated otherwise.
Anyway, I found information from the globalsecurity website that detailed the avionic systems for the F-14D. Here: F-14 Tomcat
It did mention MIL-STD-1553D DMDB in there.
5 Likes
yea dont share somethinng if its resticted outside the US that’s not a good idea.
Since we already have the F-14A and F-14B, this should probably be added to the game at some point.
But personally I have to disagree about the AIM-120 and VTAS. The Predeployment Update software, which is required for the AIM-120 employment on the F-14D, has never been applied to a production aircraft.
VTAS makes even less sense than the AMRAAM. It was only temporarily tested on the F-14A and never been discussed or suggested for integration into the F-14D. While there could be some feasibility for AMRAAM (although I’m still personally against it), VTAS is just impossible. Maybe we could add VTAS to the F-14A Early in game, it’s a completely different story for the F-14D.
3 Likes
I mean, the AIM-120 was never actually integrated into the F-14D either, so why would the software matter for its addition?
Likewise, if Yak-141 got HMS because “it would have received it”, I’d say the F-14D is more than elligible considering the preceding variants actually had tested the VTAS, so integrating it into the F-14D wouldn’t have been a large problem.
4 Likes
Wouldnt that be accounted for well know “previsions for AIM-120” that F-14 received? You can find it in couple sources
1 Like
The U.S. Navy phased out VTAS several years before the F-14D’s deployment. It was obsolete and produced in very small numbers, so no one asked to put it on the F-14D.
It is separate effort. The Pre-Deployment Update, as the name implies, was planned before the F-14D’s deployment, but was delayed and eventually cancelled in 1996. The term ‘provisions for AIM-120’ most likely refers to the physical ability (launchers and involved stuffs) to load and carry AMRAAMs.
1 Like
good stuff
1 Like
We still have some vehicles in-game that aren’t/weren’t capable of using certain weaponry, like the German premium Mig-21 with SARH missiles it couldn’t use, I’m pretty sure the first Mig-29 couldn’t use R-27ER because it was added way later to other, upgraded Mig-29 variants, etc.
Altough I can see why you’re against the AMRAAM, I believe it would be better for them to add it to this final F-14D variant, so it differs more from the previous variants, and so that it makes it less likely to be a premium (instead of something like an F-14A late).
4 Likes
Personally, I think the F-14D is already huge improvement over the F-14B just by having radar with all-aspect look-down/shoot-down capability. Given the low BR across the F-14 family, I think the F-14D would be a very competitive aircraft even without the AMRAAM, if the BR is on the same level as the F-15A.
Of course, it’s all up to the developers. Since I don’t want to get in the way of others expressing their opinions, so I’ll leave it at that.
7 Likes
I don’t know in the future gajin add F-14D limited active radar homing Air-to-Air Missile AIM-54C & AIM-54+ only but without AIM-120 or AIM-54C & AIM-54C+ and AIM-120B
But semi-active radar homing AIM-7MH & AIM-7P, maybe
I’m not sure 2x AIM-9M or AIM-9M-8 stock
3 Likes
would be nice to have, with aim95 and aim120a
3 Likes