I can do the same to a Leo 2, abrams, T-72, etc.
I think the chally is the only immune one from what I remember.
M1A1 11.3 → 11.7 OR Ariete 11.7 → 11.3
M1A1 is actually better than the Ariete, but ignoring that for the sake of argument, they should be the same BR
2 Likes
anything that has like more than 38mm side usually resist it
if M1A1 is 11.7 it needs more accurate armor
The M1A1 with the initial armor package (same as M1IP) is pretty much accurate AFAIK.
Sure M1A1 Click-Bait is 11.7 but that is also undertiered because it’s a premium and can’t be 12.0
1 Like
I disagree
You telling me with an extra 2.2222222x times
more composite only add 50mm more ke
protection?
Your right ariete should go down. I mean tbf that’s the same with a lot of the upper tier Italian tanks.
It’s a marder 3 hull, literally. Found at 7.7.
I’m aware, yet it lacks auto tracking to utilize it on planes without heavy practice and for helis it requires you rangefind them which gives away what you’re doing or guess the range
refer to
refer to
You don’t need to laze helis… smh, if you do, none have LWS at those brs. Maybe 10.3 and above may have them.
Look at the hulls my guy, you’ll be surprised.
The AP rounds work wonders…
overrating it overall
So it’s just me eh? That’s why it’s spammed out? Same with the tams?
To be honest HC, M1A2 and Click Bait could go to 12.0 as well.
1 Like
They should, but the Click-Bait is premium so it can’t.
1 Like
isnt spammed
lol okay. Neither is the turn III I guess
You just a USSR troll? Get real with these comments before you end up on my ignore list
3 Likes
Your the one being a troll my guy, and here I thought we agree on things quite often.
This man is a russian main for sure lmao
7 Likes
I have a hard time understand why anyone still think the vehicle is overperforming when they also played it and has negative kd in it?
4 Likes
M163 is better than a zsu-23-4 at 8.0, and is a Vietnam era spaa. Even without the tracking radar it’s pretty decent in anti light tank and spaa.
Xm800 is good but 8.7 is a bit much.
Pretty sure the kugel was a paper tank no? But 6.7 probably wouldn’t make it too op.
PZH2000 I agree
Turm III I agree
Obj.906 I disagree. It’s a slower reload by 0.3 secs, and worse armor, which I would say equals the lack of a stabilizer for the Char. The char also has a bigger gun to compensate for slightly worse pen.
The size of the obj. 906 is like a bus vs the char, but the char has better armor.
If anything they are on equal footing.
T-55AMD could go to 9.0, but this has to be justified properly. T-55AM-1 just has addd armor, while it is a good tank, it doesn’t survive uptiers if at all.
ZA-35 I agree.
Type-99 has an auto loader. With a 15 Kg he warhead, with a decent speed for the vehicle.
R3-T106 probably is best to stay where it is, it has a decent lineup around it.
ITPSV definitely deserves a nerf I agree. It’s so easy to blast about the battlefield and get easy nukes in, just as easy as the fox.