Ground Vehicles **PROPOSED** RB battle rating changes

Before you make baseless accusations, please check your facts. I very rarely squad up. Also, on the base of simply insulting me, imagine playing this game since the ~2013 and not being able to get a 3 kd anywhere on your front page. I also do not enjoy nor want to play higher tiers as the vehicles do not interest me.

It’s also really amusing how terrible players like you are trying to determine what makes a player good or not. Please feel free to reply, or you could get off the forums and go look for that elusive good kd.

1 Like

I never insulted you, of course if you don’t think being called a clubber is an insult.

It’s weird how a good player like you have such a bad eyesight.

But you still played hundreds if not thousands of games at higher tiers, while barely making it positive on plenty of those vehicles.

Recreating T14 clubbing stats in higher tier vehicles seems kinda hard for such a skilled player like you, but you somehow claim people in lower tiers are better at the game. That’s a nice way to contradict yourself buddy.

Difference between me and you is that my stats don’t immediately vanish the moment I play something that’s not meta.

1 Like

Quite false actually, you just do not have really good stats to vanish. Feel free to keep yapping though.
As I said it is amusing.

Unless you cant read.
I never said that. at all?
@UniqueScorpions is a different person to me.

We have told you why its unreliable, again your choosing not to read other comments.

no you brought up the T29 has 3 .50 cals.
i brought up, mobility, reload, armour, turret traverses etc. I was the one to compare them when you flat out said the T29 was better.

How is it lying? the comet is actually sitting 145 battles above the spitfire mk24.
However i stated ground vehicles of the same rank.
in which the comet sits 288 battles higher.

I was comparing rank 7s not rank 5.6.7 .

Again read what i said before typing this malarky out.

1 Like

You are blatently ignoring what others have said.

started some mad long ass drama over Hee haw.

now are literally not reading what people are saying, and accusing them of using “strawman” tactics in conversation.

Now you are here, insinuating others are
A. Lying
B. trying to use strawmen
C. Are catagorically wrong (when they arent)
D. Are also insulting others stats which was completely irrelevant to the original discussion

And finally, have taken this so far off topic youve literally killed the damn topic in teh first place.

2 Likes

Keep clubbing 4.7s though, that’s the only thing you’re good at.
Judging by your barely 1 K/D in plenty of stuff, I guess you can’t handle anything higher than WW2 unless it’s a meta vehicle.

Then ask someone to close it. That is the done thing on the forums right?

Can you read stats? Actually no, so I will just help you out since that is obviously needed.


So here in this image, the top vehicle is the comet 1, as you can see. The vehicle below it, the spitfire I was referring to, is, as stated, about 150 matches below it. See? The spitfire is british, and a vehicle. This is evidently hard to understand. I am unsure why you think I would bring a 7.0 plane into battle with an, at the time I last played it, 5.7 tank.

1 Like

Drop your attitude man.

it doesnt need to get closed at all because one person and their ego decided to try and attack literally most of the thread.

Like I have stated in numerous comments, once you get proven wrong.

So yes if you actually read what I said.
The commet sits 288 battles higher than the next tank of the SAME BR AND RANK which shows one death leaving.

You are now quite literally not reading what I or others are saying to you.
sod off

Right just for you, let’s go through rank 7 things I recently played. M1a1, a more than 4 kd. leopard 2k, fixing some stats on it, about a 3 kd. Ipm1, about a 3 kd. leopard 2a4 for italy, congrats just over a 1 kd. I am sure once I get it spaded it will quickly rise. Rad, about a 4kd even while it’s barely past stock. gepard 1a2, about a 3 kd. Vcc 80/30, about a 3 kd. Dardo, a about 0.2 kd, the single outlier. Let’s compare them to your recently played rank 7 tanks shall we? But hey all of these are obviously meta vehicles so let’s compare your stats in them? Or is everything I play a meta vehicle to you? Once again, trashcan talking, go look for that 3kd.

“You used the comet, on its own for a very long time some 300 battles more than any other british vehicle, that shows me youve been one deaht leaving with it.”

Your words buddy, do you forget what you say so quickly?

again.

IPM1 sits hundreds of games bellow the M1A1 227 exactly.
The M1A1 at release was an absolute power house and stomped regularly. SAME as the standard M1.

Leopard 2K sat at an insanely oppressive BR and had thermals as well. Even my KD in it is good.
Its a pretty busted tank.
you have 124 more games in that than any other rank 7 german tank.

The fact your so obsessed with KD in a team based objective based game shows your egos went to your head mate.

Get out there on your own, play random battles and see how good your KD is.

All the same you goons that sit in squadrons like that, think your gods and that your word is law when it comes to the vehicles when majority of you farm up KD and ODL like mad so you dont look bad.

I am playing random battles, I literally said that I very rarely squad up.

Id try verify it watching a replay, but i cant find you. nor on stat shark, or thunderskill.

you claim to run in a top squadron for tournaments then say you play solo.

Bit strange that lad

Then look harder, it’s not like I am non-existent. Also where did I say I run in a top squadron for tournaments??? And then secondly, why can’t I play solo? Is there some issue with that?

I literally copy and paste your name in
It doesnt show up with anything even closely related to the stats you have in game.

And the replays dont show me games with you in them.

like i said drop the attitude xD

not gonna lie habby it feels like to me youre now trying to get this post locked just to spite @UniqueScorpions .

1 Like

Dude I don’t care about him, he isn’t arguing. You seem to not like me here so idk you also seem to be unable to just leave? And my attitude is perfectly fine, thanks

Youve insulted him a few times.

You came into a topic we where all having nice pleasant discussion and started having a dig at many people for their stats. Hence why so many dug back at yours.

Your attitude is not fine at all lad. It’s a passively aggressive attitude towards other forum members who were literally here to discuss BR changes, IF ¡YOU didnt like what we where saying and YOU didnt like how we used the vehicles, why didnt YOU leave. seeing as YOU are such the good player and veteran player?

you chose to start an argument over nothing and now when told youre at cause you take a childish response and tell me to leave? . you massively derailed scorpions post, almost every other commenter has went quiet since you piped up about stats, and needing 2.0Kds etc

No one cba with that sort of stuff mate. If we wanted that kinda chat wed bounce on over to our repsective squadrons.

1 Like

You have 27 battles combined between Dardo, 1A2, Rad90 and VCC 80/30.
Now take a look at literally every USSR/UK vehicle you played.

You do well in meta vehicles like M1A1, 2K, 2A4, KPz-70 and such, but massively fail to recreate that in anything that’s not considered to be one of the best tanks at their BR.

You can surely go take a look at my stats in Type 90, TKX, 2A4, Rad 90, XM-803 and such.
Those are definitely really strong for their BR.

These changes are mostly good - except for Russia, which imo should stay as they are for the time being.

Lol, no.

Honestly it should be 5.7 along with the Panther D. 5.3 is still too low.

Funny how most of the Russian vehicles are going down in BR while almost everything else is going up. Also the fact that the 2s38 is not on this list and going to 11.0 is hilarious.

Fine. But give the US m829a4. Reload is a balancing mechanic. If we go by historical data, the US should get better ammunition.

No. the reload is too long.

Could be a lot higher. It would be fine at 10.0.