“hold still and take it like a man?”
Good luck with that. ;)
Like I said …
as much as i would love to abuse this, its fine at 6.3 if you are struggling with this tank massive skill issue ngl
3 Likes
eehhh not really, its like the tiger 2p when it comes to the turret armour layout, you can, but there are very thin slits you gotta line up to do so.
good thing the t44 is a slow vehicle that cant react to enemies… wait a minute.
M26 beats T-44 in all scenarios. Better gun, better armor.
Let me guess.
Yeah…
So that is it when it comes to any experience.
Same performance? What are You talking about?
Oh.
That explains a lot.
Not really. Panther/Tiger I can deal with T-44 with ease.
1 Like
Sure pal, not like someone might not play every lineup in realistic…
1 Like
Sure, that is why I don’t talk about vehicles I don’t use
1 Like
Except maybe I have used those vehicles? Read my statement again.
Edit: the only one I’ll give you is the STP, because I was already past it in the Soviet TT when it was added and I only unlocked it like a week or so ago
1 Like
I have shown Your profile and how many games You have in these vehicles.
11 games in Sherman 76, lmao. Not to mention 0 in M26
I’m going to have to spell it out for you, will I not?
If you are so tied to the idea that personal statistics are the be-all-end-all when it comes to determining whether or not someone has any right to speak, check my US ARCADE
2 Likes
Should I spell out to You that if You are going to discuss vehicles then You should at least have some experience in them? Not to mention that You should spade them?
This is RB section of the game, not AB.
I don’t really care what experience You have in AB.
2 Likes
Does not mean that there is 0 overlap in performance between RB and AB for a tank. The armour and the gun don’t change at all.
Well wouldn’t you know it, I have both the T-44 and M26 spaded. Funny that.
In that case it might just be better to say we cannot agree, nor change the others mind.
A lot changes when it comes to gun handling and maneuverability.
In AB You have 0 games in T-44, this is pure comedy.
Congrats to You, hope You will get some experience in them before discussing it.
We don’t agree because You are talking about AB experience, I talk about RB in RB section of the forum
Same. I can’t really have a well informed opinion over a vehicle I’ve never used.
Going to disagree with the T1E1(90). In terms of effectiveness, it’s a M4(T26) with worse turret armor. Yes it has a reverse gear but overall it’s a slower vehicle. And not to mention it is huge. It has no stabilizer like the other M6’s. I don’t think it’s too strong for its BR, it plays like a tank destroyer more than a heavy tank. If you are having trouble penetrating the vehicle, it is purely a skill issue, the armor isn’t good at 5.0, let alone 5.7.
2 Likes
To be honest, it’s as good as the M4 (T26), maybe slightly better.
The turret armour is worse, yes, but the engine armour is a lot more usable against APHE than the Sherman’s hull, and the reverse speed allows it to get out of bad situations and side-scrape.
The M4 (T26) acceleration is better but not by a substantial degree.
They should be the same BR, but I’d argue the M4 (T26) should be 5.7 rather than the T1E1 (90) going to 6.0.
T58->whatever the highest BR is
genuinely egregious vehicle. it would be an objective good for the game if it was just deleted.
It is no more or less unsportsmanlike than doing stuff like angling your hull (for the right vehicles) or using third person view to stay fully hidden while getting vision over cover etc. It is a positional tactic like any other, and for some vehicles (e.g. Jagdtiger or Tutel) it’s an essential tactic if you’re poorly positioned and need to avoid being disabled. Whether that’s being barreled or being shot in a weak spot.
‘Conqueror 7.7 > 8.0’
Bait used to be believable. Maybe if reload was historical instead of for balance and APDS didn’t shatter 50% of the time and do little to no damage the other 50%
2 Likes